Page 43 - Decoding Culture
P. 43

36  DECODING CULTURE

           civilization by encouraging discrimination. In so doing they deeply
           influenced the character of literary education in Britain.
             The similarity of this  analysis to  that found  in  the  mass  soci­
           ety / media  effects  tradition  is  quite  obvious.  Both  views  see
           modern  society in crisis;  both  see that crisis  as  emerging  from
           specific features of industrial societies; both see culture and taste
           as stratified; and both are deeply unsympathetic to the products of
           new, twentieth-century forms of popular culture. The Leavisite view
           is  distinctive, however,  in  three  main  respects.  First,  it supposes
           that an  ideal  form  of social  organization  is  possible,  an  organic
           community within which people may live as  'integral parts'. The
           positive value placed on this way of life is apparent in the use that
           Leavis  and Thompson  (1933)  make  of the work of Sturt who, as
           'George  Bourne', had  written  somewhat romantically of the  rich
           traditions of rural civilization. However, lest the wrong impression
           be given,  it  should  be noted that Leavisism  is more  inclined  to
           bemoan the loss of organic living  (and praise its expression in D.
           H.  Lawrence)  than to  propose  utopian alternatives to modernity.
           Theirs  is  not  a  revolutionary  doctrine  in  pursuit  of  primitive
           communalism.
             Secondly, they are distinctive in the emphasis they place upon
           education and the promotion of critical awareness. In spite of the
           tone  of  apocalyptic  dismay  that  pervades  the  1930s  work,
           Leavisism retains a degree  of optimism  about the  possibility of
           defending and developing culture. Although clearly elitist in their
           views about the role of the educated minority, they were not back­
           ward  in condemning the  pretensions  and lack of discrimination
           among those who conventionally laid claim to 'high' culture. The
           capacity for discrimination was not inherited, or a necessary func­
           tion  of class - it was learned.  So,  if critical  awareness could  and
           should  be taught,  as  they  argue, then  that  suggests  an  implicit
           humanist commitment to, if not the perfectibility, then at least the





                              Copyrighted Material
   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48