Page 41 - Decoding Culture
P. 41

34  DECODING CULTURE
          cultural decline and in ensuring the preservation of a stable status
          quo. However, it is the spirit rather than the detail of Arnold's views
          that inform this century's embodiment of the 'culture  and civiliza­
          tion' position, so I shall here concentrate on the mediation of these
          ideas in the work of Leavis and his associates. They address con­
          cerns about distinctively twentieth-century culture and they were
          hugely influential, if indirectly,  in forming the 'literary' context in
          which cultural studies first developed.
            Leavis himself wrote abundantly on a range of literary and cul­
          tural topics,  much  of his  work appearing  initially  in the journal
          Scrutiny in the 1930s. Scrutiny represented a crucial moment in lit­
          erary  and  cultural  criticism  in  the  English-speaking  world
          (Mulhern, 1979) and served as a focus for the emergence of what
          might  loosely  be  called  'Leavisism'.  For  my present purposes,
          Leavisism can be understood as having two main components:  a
          general  cultural  critique and,  not  unrelated,  a  body  of detailed
          analysis and evaluation of literary and cultural texts. I shall begin
          this  account  by  briefly  examining  the  familiar  features  of
          Leavisism's cultural  critique,  and then go  on to  consider some
          aspects of the critical methodology that Leavis  developed in the
          course of his specific analyses.  Both  features  had  an important
          impact on early cultural studies.
            The basic terms of Leavis' position are made very clear on the
          first page of Mass Civilisation and Minority Culture. 'In any period,'
          he writes,  'it is upon a very small  minority  that the  discerning
          appreciation of art and literature  depends'  (Leavis,  1930:  3) .  But
          this minority's significance extends beyond their capacity to appre­
          ciate  'art and literature'  for they constitute  'the consciousness of
          the race' (ibid: 4). He continues in similar vein:
            Upon this minority  depends our power of profiting by the  finest
             human experience of the past; they keep alive the subtlest and most
             perishable parts  of the  tradition.  Upon them  depend the implicit





                              Copyrighted Material
   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46