Page 461 - Design and Operation of Heat Exchangers and their Networks
P. 461

444   Design and operation of heat exchangers and their networks


          manipulating input j shall be as small as possible compared with the response
          time to any disturbance input k. This criterion is in fact for a feedforward
          control; however, since it will yield a quick response of a controlled output
          to the corresponding manipulating input, we can use it also for a feedback
          control.

          9.2.3 Minimal interaction requirements
          An effective control structure also requires a minimal interaction among the
          manipulating variables. We hope that a controlled variable i shall be more
          sensitive to its pairing manipulating variable j and less sensitive to other
          manipulating variables k (k6¼j). Papalexandri and Pistikopoulos (1994b)
          further introduced a minimal interaction criterion into the synthesis model
          as follows:


                      G ik  G ij   1 m ij M 3 + α 3   0 8i, j,kk 6¼ jð  Þ  (9.33)
          where i indicates a controlled output ϕ i , j indicates a pairing manipulating
          input c j , k indicates a nonpairing manipulating input c k (k6¼j), and G ik is
          the gain of the controlled output ϕ i to the manipulating input c k , which
          is defined by

                                             ∂ϕ
                                              i
                                      G ik ¼                          (9.34)

                                            ∂c k
             The synthesis and retrofit design with controllability requirements can be
          expressed by Eq. (9.30) with additional constraints (9.31)–(9.33).

          9.3 Operation of heat exchanger networks
          under uncertainty

          A HEN is usually designed at given fixed operating conditions. However,
          there may exist deviations of some inlet parameters of process streams.
          A HEN designed with the methods described in the previous sections should
          have a satisfied operability and controllability to shift between different
          operation states, since they have already been considered in the synthesis/
          retrofit process. In this section, we will discuss its online optimization or
          the control between two steady states. To find methods for the operation
          of HENs, Mathisen et al. (1992) investigated bypass selection for control
          of HEN, without considering the utility consumption. Glemmestad et al.
          (1997) proposed a method for optimal operation of HENs. Their method
          uses steady-state optimization carried out online with regular time intervals.
   456   457   458   459   460   461   462   463   464   465   466