Page 187 - Design for Environment A Guide to Sustainable Product Development
P. 187

166    Cha pte r  Ni ne

               of environmental performance quite challenging. While  product
               development teams need not analyze each life-cycle stage in exhaus-
               tive detail, they need to be aware of those environmental issues, at
               any stage of the life cycle, that are relevant to either customer needs
               or technical and financial constraints.
                   Table 9.1 lists the different types of methods available for each of
               the following purposes.
                    • Screening and comparison methods are used to narrow
                      design choices among a set of alternatives; examples include
                      threshold limits for chemical properties such as biodegrad-
                      ability, and material selection priority lists based on recy-
                      clability or other characteristics.
                    • Performance assessment methods are used to evaluate the
                      expected performance of designs with respect to particular
                      objectives; examples include calculation of expected material
                      recovery rates and estimation of environmental concentra-
                      tions associated with specified emission levels. Assessment
                      methods may range from simple qualitative indices to life-
                      cycle assessment studies to sophisticated numerical simula-
                      tion models that assess environmental impacts.
                    • Trade-off analysis methods are used to compare the ex  -
                      pected cost and performance of several alternative design
                      choices with respect to one or more attributes of interest. Such
                      methods may include quality-function matrices, “what-if” sim-
                      ulations, cost/benefit analysis, or other types of integrated
                      analyses that draw upon various performance assessment
                      methods described above. For example, parametric  analysis


                              Screening &    Performance    Trade-off
                              Comparison     Assessment     Analysis
                Tangible      Acceptance     Functional
                evaluation    requirements   testing
                Qualitative   Criteria-based  Qualitative   Scoring
                assessment    checklists     indices        matrices

                Environmental   Footprint    Life-cycle     Predictive
                analysis      indicators     assessment     simulation
                Risk analysis  Vulnerability   Quantitative risk  Integrated risk
                              assessment     assessment     evaluation
                Financial                    Life-cycle     Cost/benefit
                analysis                     accounting     analysis

               TABLE 9.1  Overview of DFE Analysis Methods
   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192