Page 301 - Design for Environment A Guide to Sustainable Product Development
P. 301

Medical and Pharmaceutical Industries       277

               applying “green chemistry” principles during process development.
               For example, chemists use electronic lab notebooks that include
               green chemistry assessment tools, providing chemists with immedi-
               ate feedback on process efficiency and the availability of less hazard-
               ous alternative materials.
                   According to Steve Gillman, Executive Director, Corporate Health,
               Safety and Environment, “The most significant health, safety, and envi-
               ronmental (HSE) improvements result from our ongoing efforts to
               design new products and processes to minimize HSE impacts from the
               start. Applying green chemistry and inherently safer design principles
               to our process development efforts helps us ‘get it right the first time’.”
                   At key milestones in its “stage-gate” development process, Lilly
               verifies material use efficiency based on metrics, such as process mass
               intensity (PMI), which is the ratio of material used per unit of active
               pharmaceutical ingredient produced. For example, a recent process
               improvement for a product designed to treat anxiety and depression
               would reduce hazardous material usage by more than 80%, saving
               more than 3 million kilograms of raw materials and 6 million liters of
               water per year at peak production. Figure 14.3 illustrates the reduc-
               tion in PMI due to improved synthetic chemistry from an early devel-
               opment route to a process ready for manufacturing.
                   Lilly scientists and engineers are continually working to apply
               the latest scientific knowledge when designing pharmaceutical pro-
               duction processes. Product development teams evaluate attributes
               that predict the future HSE burden of a process, along with more tra-
               ditional criteria, such as yield, quality, cost, and equipment needs. In



























                FIGURE 14.3  Process mass intensity reduction due to improved synthetic
                chemistry.
   296   297   298   299   300   301   302   303   304   305   306