Page 414 - Design for Six Sigma a Roadmap for Product Development
P. 414

Design for X  381

           TABLE 10.7 Questions to Ask in a Pre–Economic Evaluation of DFE

           1.  Amount of available funds for financing the project. Will the DFSS team have to
              ask for more budgets?
           2.  What is the minimum attractive rate of return (MARR)? What discount rate should
              be used to evaluate the project? What is investment timeframe?
           3.  What is the economic lifetime of the project?
           4.  Is the lifetime of the project the same as the customer’s timeframe so that the
              investment will prove feasible?
           5.  What are the operating costs associated with the environmentally friendly design?
              For example, in the automotive industry, the escalation rate of fuel is a
              consideration. Will fuel inflate at a higher rate than the dollar?
           6.  Government incentives (federal/state/local). Will any incentives play a role in the
              overall economic evaluation?


           provisions (Huang 1996). The method employs process action and sen-
           sitivity charts to identify and trace significant parameters affecting the
           LCC. The ABC method assumes that the design, whether a product,
           a service, or a process, consumes activities. This assumption differenti-
           ates  ABC from conventional cost estimation methods that assume
           resources consumption. Let us use the example of a materials-handling
           step elimination in manufacturing. A conventional cost method may
           translate this cost reduction into reduction of direct labor with an
           equivalent amount. The ABC method translates this into elimination
           of activities to reduce materials-handling cost, a direct and precise
           translation. This assumption made ABC very attractive to modeling
           among other spectra of benefits that include superiority of cost tracing,
           separation of direct and indirect cost components, higher accuracy, and
           alignment to activity-based management systems. The ABC process is
           depicted in Fig. 10.9.
             The ABC objective is to identify activities in the design life, and then
           assign reliable cost drivers and consumption intensities to the activi-
           ties. Probability distributions are given to represent inherent cost
           uncertainty. Monte Carlo simulation and other discrete-event simula-
           tion techniques are then used to model uncertainty and to estimate the
           effect of uncertainty on cost. The uncertainty effect can be estimated
           by exercising a controlled virtual experiment within the simulation
           model. Different commercial simulation methods exist such as Crystal
           Ball (usually added to the Microsoft Excel spreadsheet) and
           SigmaFlow, derived from the Simul8 platform. SigmaFlow has addi-
           tional Six Sigma analysis capabilities. Uncertainty can be modeled in
           many ways. We can model uncertainty based on historical data using
           probability theory, an incremental design scenario, or we can model
           uncertainty subjectively based on experience and fuzzy-set theory
   409   410   411   412   413   414   415   416   417   418   419