Page 69 - Design for Six Sigma for Service (Six SIGMA Operational Methods)
P. 69

50   Chapter Three

        be converted to dollars. We can say that all these definitions converge to the
        denominator that is a measure of cost. The numerators converge to a
        measure of functions, or performances. Therefore in value engineering,
        value is measured primarily as a function-to-cost ratio. A product with better
        functionality and lower cost gives a higher value.

        In value engineering, if a product or method can accomplish a given
        function with the lowest cost compared with all competitors, then this
        product or method is called the best value. Clearly, a higher function-to-
        cost ratio is important for increasing value in the eyes of customers.
        However, in this author’s opinion, the function-to-cost ratio alone is not
        sufficient to provide an adequate measure for customer value for the
        following two reasons:
          1. It is a convention that people also like to measure value in dollars. In value
             engineering, sometimes the best value of a function is also defined as the
             lowest cost to accomplish that function, that is, in dollars. But this def-
             inition is not consistent with the definition that value is function divided
             by cost. (Does this imply that function has the unit of dollars squared?)
          2. There are many cases where two products have exactly the same
             function, but people are willing to pay different prices for them. For
             example, the Toyota Corolla is actually exactly the same car as the
             GEO Prizm, but people are willing to pay $300 more to buy a Toyota
             Corolla. As another example, the same item in a neighborhood con-
             venience store will usually sell at a significantly higher price than that
             in a large discount chain store. So the function-to-cost ratio alone
             cannot explain the value in the eyes of customers adequately.

        Sherden (1994) and Gale (1994) provided a broader definition for customer
        value. In their view, the customer value is defined as perceived benefit
        (benefits) minus perceived cost (liabilities), specifically,
                           Value = benefits – liabilities
        The benefits include

          1. Functional benefits
             a. Product functions, functional performance levels,
             b. Economic benefits, revenues (for investment services)
             c. Reliability and durability
          2. Psychological benefits
             a. Prestige and emotional factors, such as brand name reputation
             b. Perceived dependability (for example, people prefer a known-
               brand product to an unknown-brand product)
   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74