Page 147 - Design of Simple and Robust Process Plants
P. 147

132  Chapter 4 Process Synthesis and Design Optimization
                   An alternative for this structure is a furnace provided with a gas turbine (Fig-
                 ure 4.40). In this alternative, the process streams are cross-exchanged but the option
                 for air pre-heating is not available. Therefore, the flue-gases must be cooled at
                 decreasing temperature; this is shown as high, medium, and low heat recovery.
                   For separation systems, we have a similar type of integration effort. The activities
                 to minimize energy targets through flowsheet modification (as shown in the distilla-
                 tion train example; Figures 4.16±4.20), has to be extended by clever energy integra-
                 tion, which is a challenge. The application of an order of priority: unit, section, pro-
                 cess, site (complex) is also applicable for separations. One might consider heat inte-
                 gration between an extractive distillation column and the successive solvent from
                 the stripper column. In the case of a large difference in pressure between an absor-
                 ber and desorber, a reverse-running pump to drive the solvent circulation might also
                 offer a clever integration option.
                  With the above designs the basic rules for heat integration are reflected.


                 4.2.3.6  Is there conflict between process integration and process simplification?
                The target for simplification was to explore options from a simplicity perspective to
                 achieve a high-quality, economical, optimal process. The objective for process integra-
                 tion was to determine minimum consumption levels ± to challenge the targets and,
                 based on a minimum target, to design integrated networks that optimize the design.
                   By following the approach of pinch networking without restrictions, the result
                 might be complicated configurations. Both approaches must respect the constraints
                 as applicable, including operability and controllability requirements. In particular,
                 these requirements will put a damper on unrestricted integration. An integrated
                 process which does not have sufficient disturbance rejection capability will not be
                 exploited to its design intent. The answer to the above question is that, as long as
                 the decisions are based on the most economical solution while respecting the con-
                 straints, there should not be a conflict.


                 Summary
                 Process integration is an activity that is applied extensively, its initial objective being
                 to reduce energy consumption. Nowadays, the objective is extended to minimize the
                 use of natural resources from the perspective of creating a sustainable world. Pro-
                 cess integration may result in complex operations, and therefore requires careful
                 design, with recognition of its limitations.
                   .  Process integration can be differentiated in:
                   ±  Level of process integration; per unit, section, overall process, between differ-
                      ent processes and at site level.
                   ±  Streams, as raw material and utility streams.
                   .  Constraints are a major issue during integration, and these need to be ana-
                      lyzed carefully to avoid large disappointments during operation, the factors
                      that play a major role are; availability, variability and disturbances.
                   .  Constraints may be notified if we address the following questions:
                   ±  How dependent or independent is the operation of the integrated streams?
   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152