Page 63 - Determinants and Their Applications in Mathematical Physics
P. 63

48   3. Intermediate Determinant Theory
          Proof.


                        a 11   a 12  ···   a 1,j−1  a 1,j+1  ···  a 1n  x 1

                        a 21   a 22  ···   a 2,j−1  a 2,j+1  ···  a 2n  x 2

                        ..........................................................

          B ij =(−1) i+j   a i−1,1  a i−1,2  ··· a i−1,j−1  a i−1,j+1  ··· a i−1,n  x i−1     .

                              a i+1,2  ···  a i+1,j−1  a i+1,j+1  ···  a i+1,n  x i+1
                        a i+1,i

                        ..........................................................

                        a n1   a n2  ···  a n,j−1  a n,j+1  ···  a nn   x n

                         y 1    y 2  ···   y j−1    y j+1   ···          z
                                                                 y n
                                                                            n
            The expansion is obtained by applying arguments to B ij similar to those
          applied to B in Theorem 3.9. Since the second cofactor is zero when r = i
                                              2
          or s = j the double sum contains (n − 1) nonzero terms, as expected. It
          remains to prove that B ij = E ij .
            Transfer the last row of B ij to the ith position, which introduces the sign
          (−1) n−i  and transfer the last column to the jth position, which introduces
          the sign (−1) n−j . The result is E ij , which completes the proof.
            The Cauchy expansion of an arbitrary determinant focuses attention on
          one arbitrarily chosen element a ij and its cofactor.
          Theorem 3.11. The Cauchy expansion
                                        n   n

                           A = a ij A ij +    a is a rj A ir,sj .
                                       r=1 s=1
          First Proof. The expansion is essentially the same as that given in Theorem
          3.10. Transform E ij back to A by replacing z by a ij , x r by a rj and y s by
          a is . The theorem appears after applying the relation
                                   A ir,js = −A ir,sj .              (3.7.2)
            Second Proof. It follows from (3.2.3) that

                               n

                                 a rj A ir,sj =(1 − δ js )A is .
                              r=1
          Multiply by a is and sum over s:
                      n   n               n          n

                            a is a rj A ir,sj =  a is A is −  δ js a is A is
                     r=1 s=1             s=1        s=1
                                      = A − a ij A ij ,
          which is equivalent to the stated result.

          Theorem 3.12. If y s =1, 1 ≤ s ≤ n, and z =0, then
                                n

                                  B ij =0,  1 ≤ i ≤ n.
                               j=1
   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68