Page 331 - Discrimination at Work The Psychological and Organizational Bases

DIPBOYE
298
Eagly, A., Ashmore, R. D., Makhijani, M. G., & Longo, L. C. (1991). What is beautiful is good,
: A meta-analytic review of research on the physical attractiveness stereotype.
but
Psychological Bulletin, 110,109-128.
Ellis, S., Barak, A., & Pinto, A. (1991). Moderating effects of personal cognitions on expe­
rienced and perceived sexual harassment of women at the workplace. Journal of Applied
Social Psychology, 21,1320-1337.
Fiske, S. T., & Cox, M. G. (1979). Person concepts: The effect of target familiarity and
descriptive purpose on the process of describing others. Journal of Personality, 47,136–161.
Fontenelle, G. A., Peek-Phillips, A., & Lane, D. M. (1985). Generalizing across stimuli as well
as subjects. A neglected aspect of external validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 70,101-
107.
Frieze, I. H., Olson, J. E., & Good, D. C. (1990). Perceived and actual discrimination in the
salaries of male and female managers. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 20,46-67.
Frieze, I. H., Olson, J. E., & Russell, J. (1991). Attractiveness and income for men and women
in management. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 21,1039-1057.
Giancoli, D. L., & Neimeyer, G. J. (1983). Liking preferences toward handicapped persons.
Perceptual and Motor Skills, 57,1005-1006.
Goffman, E. (1963). Stigma: Notes on the management of spoiled identity. Englewood Cliffs, NJ:
Prentice-Hall.
Goldman, W., & Lewis, P. (1977). Beautiful is good: Evidence that the physically attractive
are more socially skillful. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13,125-130.
Greenwald, M. (1981). The effects of physical attractiveness, experience, and social perfor­
mance on employee decision making in job interviews. Behavioral Counseling Quarterly, 1,
275-287.
Guion, R. M., & Gibson, W. M. (1988). Personnel selection and placement. In M. R. Rosenzweig,
& L. W. Porter (Eds.), Annual Review of Psychology, 62,199-202.
Hatfield, E., & Sprecher, S. (1986).Mirror, mirror.... New York: State University of New York
Press.
Hebl, M. R., Tickle, J., & Heatherton, T. F. (2000). Awkward moments in interactions between
nonstigmatized and stigmatized individuals. In T. F. Heatherton, Robert F. Kleck, M. R.
Hebl, & J. G. Hull (Eds.), The social psychology of stigma (pp. 275-306). New York: Guilford.
Heilman, M. E. (1983). Sex bias in work settings: The lack of fit model. In B. M. Staw & L. L.
Cummings (Eds.),Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 5). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
Heilman, M. E., & Saruwatari, L. R. (1979). When beauty is beastly: The effects of appearance
and sex on evaluations of job applicants for managerial and nonmanagerial jobs.
Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 23,360-372.
Heilman, M. E., & Stopeck, M. H. (1985a). Being attractive, advantage or disadvantage?
Performance based evaluations and recommended personnel actions as a function of
appearance, sex, and job type. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 35, 202­
215.
Heilman, M. E., & Stopeck, M. H. (1985b). Attractiveness and corporate success: Different
causal attributions for males and females. Journal of Applied Psychology, 70,379-388.
Hernandez, O. A. (1981). A cross-cultural comparison of adults' perceptions of infant sex and
physical attractiveness. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University, East
Lansing, MI.
Hill, M. C. (1994). Social status and physical appearance among Negro adolescents. Social
Forces, 22,443–148.
Hosoda, M., Stone-Romero, E. F, & Coats, G. (2003). The effects of physical attractiveness on
job-related outcomes: A meta-analysis of experimental studies. Personnel Psychology, 56,
431–462.