Page 601 - Dust Explosions in the Process Industries
P. 601

568  Dust Explosions in the Process Industries

           8.4.7.2
           The Situation with Dusts

           The fundamental assumption on which the flameproof concept rests (i.e., that an explo-
           sive cloud can accumulate inside enclosures by transfer of fuel from the outside) does
           not apply to dusts (see Section 8.3). By using “dust-protected‘’or “dusttight” enclo-
           sures (IP 5X or 6X), generation of explosive dust clouds inside the enclosure, such as
           by “thermal breathing” processes, can be effectively excluded. Dust particles that get
           into an enclosurethrough narrow gaps or holes at all accumulate as a layer, not as a cloud.
             In addition to considering the improbable event of  an explosive dust cloud being
           formed inside the enclosure, one must also consider that the explosive mixture outside
           the enclosure, into which explosion transmission is to be prevented, is not a gas but a
           transient dust cloud of short duration (zone 21).
             The maximum experimental safe gap concept was adopted successfully by Schuber
           (see Section 4.4.6 in Chapter 4) to prevent dust explosion transmission through rotary
           locks between process units in powder processing plants. However, this application is
           in no way related to the design of electrical equipment according to the Ex“p” concept
           for explosive gas mixtures.
             It should finally be mentioned that a most unusual dust version of the maximum exper-
           imental safe gap (MESG) concept was proposed by Harper, Plain, and Wilton (1997). In
           this case, the concern was to prevent smoldering combustion in dust layers inside enclo-
           sures from propagating to the outsidethrough holes and gaps in the enclosurewall. It seems
           that the use of the term flameproof and the designation Ex“&’ for equipment designed
           according to this idea would cause much confusion, and a completely different notation
           should be sought.


           8.5
           INTRINSICALLY SAFE ELECTRICAL APPARATUSES

           8.5.1
           THE ORIGINAL CONCEPT FOR GASES AND VAPORS

           In essence, intrinsically safe design means that all electrical components are designed
           in such a way that generation of electrical sparks or hot surfaces capable of igniting the
           premixed gas in question is effectively prohibited. This means that the maximum elec-
           trical energies that can become stored in the various parts of the electrical system, such
           as in capacitancesand inductances,must be very low. Ex‘?,”therefore,is applicable only
           to apparatuses demanding very low power or energy to operate. This design concept, in
           contrast to others, implies that electric circuitry can be in direct contact with the explo-
           sive gas or vapor atmosphere without any ignition hazard.

           8.5.2
           THE SITUATION WITH DUSTS

           In practice, electrical circuits, switches, and so forth to be used in areas containing com-
           bustible or electrically conductive dusts should, for reasons discussed in Section 8.4,
           always be kept inside enclosures. This will prevent significant quantities of  dust from
   596   597   598   599   600   601   602   603   604   605   606