Page 603 - Dust Explosions in the Process Industries
P. 603

570  Dust Explosions in the Process Industries




























                                            Figure 8.7  Three models of a capacitive surface
                                            level indicator. The model to the left, with a metal
                                            rope carrying a weight at the end, is for powders
                                            and granulates in silos.  The two other models,
                                            with coaxial and plain  metal rods  respectively,
                                            are for  liquids  in  tanks (Courtesy of G. Klotz-
                                            Engmann, Endress i Hauser, Germany).

     return of the reflected pulse from the point where the rod or rope becomes immersed
     in the powder.


     8.5.3
     THE NEW IEC EX"iD"  STANDARD FOR DUSTS

     The voluminous, detailed draft Ex"iD'  standard for dusts, produced by IEC (2002h),
     is to a large extent based on the corresponding IEC (1999~) and CENELEC (2001) stan-
     dards for gases. In view of the very limited applications for intrinsically safe electrical
     apparatuses in areas containing dusts, the proposed draft standard does not seem an opti-
     mal solution. Furthermore, in spite of entering into minute details on a number of aspects,
     the draft standard provides no guidance for differentiating between dusts of  different
     ignition sensitivities, such as by introducing dust groups corresponding to the gas groups
     in the gas standards. Instead, the gas group IIB requirements are imposed on all dusts. One
     argument in favor of this approach is that the same electrical apparatuses can be used for
     almost all combustible gases and vapors and for all dusts. However, whereas this approach
     clearly simplifies production, stocking, and sale of electrical apparatuses, it is not an accept-
     able basis for a safety standard. The basic objective of any safety standard should be to define
     borderlines between safe and unsafe conditions, with reasonable safety margins.
       In view of this, the possibility of producing a completely independent, intrinsic safety stan-
     dard for dusts should be given careful consideration. Such a standard should focus directly
     on the very limited segment of intrinsic safety technology relevant to combustible dusts and
   598   599   600   601   602   603   604   605   606   607   608