Page 608 - Dust Explosions in the Process Industries
P. 608

ElectricalApparatuses for Areas Containing Combustible Dusts  575

                 The term source ofrelease, which is indeed appropriate for gases, is not useful in the
               context of dusts and should be replaced by a more relevant term, such as area ofdust
               cloud generation.



               8.6.3
               PROTECTION BY ENCLOSURES

               8.6.3.1
               IP Enclosures

               At least four reasons for using dust tight or dust protected enclosureshave been put for-
               ward. To avoid ingress of
               0  Combustible dust that can form an explosive dust cloud inside the enclosure.
               0  Combustible dust that can form a combustible dust layer inside the enclosure.
               0  Electricallyconductive dust that can cause electricalshort-circuitinginside the enclosure.
               0  Abrasive or corrosive dust that can damage delicate mechanical and electrical com-
                 ponents inside the enclosure.

               Only ingress of dust that can form explosive dust clouds is within the “Atex” domain
               for dusts as presently defined by the existing European directives. However, ingress of
               dust that can form explosive dust clouds can be effectively prevented by IP 5X or 6X
               enclosures.
                 Safe design of electrical equipment for areas containingcombustibledusts should, with
               very few exceptions,be based on two simple concepts: The first is use of enclosuresthat
               prevent ingress of dust to the required extent; the second is adoption of measures that
               keep the temperatureof any surfacein contact with dust clouds or layers sufficientlylow
               to effectively prevent ignition. This sound philosophy is expressed clearly in current
               European standards. For example, in CENELEC (1998a, 1998b), “The ignition pro-
               tection is based on the limitation of the maximum surface temperature of the enclosure,
               and on the restriction of dust ingress into the enclosureby the use of ‘dust tight’ or ‘dust
               protected’ enclosures.”


               8.6.3.2
               Pressurized Enclosures

               The new “pressurization”standard for dusts (IEC,2001b) is self-contradictorybecause it
               rests on a fundamentally wrong assumption.This assumptionis that combustibledust that
               enters the interior of an electrical apparatusor componentenclosurethough unintentional
               tiny holes and gaps in the enclosure wall can accumulate as an explosive dust cloud inside
               the enclosure.In reality, only dust layers can be generatedby this kind of dust ingress.Hence,
               for the new standard to have some relevance, terms like explosive dust clouds, explosive
               dust air mixtures, combustible dust atmospheres, and explosive concentrations  of  com-
               bustible dust mixed with air must be replaced by layers of combustible dust throughoutthe
               standard.
   603   604   605   606   607   608   609   610   611   612   613