Page 196 - Dynamic Loading and Design of Structures
P. 196

Page 171

               control systems still remains very limited, mainly in full-scale demonstration projects.
                 In addition to purely passive and purely active control systems, hybrid systems have also
               been suggested (Soong et al., 1991), that complement each other (for instance, a passive
               damper can reduce the force that has to be reduced by the active controller), hence producing
               an effective protecting system.



                                                 4.5 REFERENCES


               AFPS [French Association for Earthquake Engineering] (1990) Recommendations pour la redaction
                 de règles relatives aux ouvgages et installations à réaliser dans les regions sujettes aux seismes,
                 Presses de l’ENPC, Paris.
               Ambraseys, N.N. and Bommer, J.J. (1995) ‘Attenuation relationships for use in Europe: an overview’ ,
                 paper given at 5th SECED Conference ‘European Seismic Design Practice’ Chester, October 1995,
                 Amsterdam, Balkema, pp. 67–74.
               Ambraseys, N.N. and Simpson, K.A. (1996) ‘Prediction of vertical response spectra in Europe’,
                 Earthquake Engineering Structural’Dynamics; 25(4): 401–12.
               Anagnostopoulos, S.A., Haviland, R.W. and Biggs, J.M. (1978) ‘Use of inelastic spectra in aseismic
                 design’, journal Struct. Division, ASCE, 104 (ST1): 95–109.
               Arnold, C. and Reitherman, R. (1982) Building Configuration and Seismic Design, John Wiley, New
                 York.
               Bertero, V.V. (1989) ‘State-of-the-art report: Ductility based structural design’, paper given at 9th
                 World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Tokyo—Kyoto, Japan, August 1988, Maruzen,
                 Tokyo, VIII, pp. 673–86.
               Booth, E. (ed.) (1994) Concrete Structures in Earthquake Regions: Design and Analysis, Longman,
                 London.
               Booth, E., Kappos, A.J. and Park, R. (1998) ‘A critical review of international practice on seismic
                 design of reinforced concrete buildings’, The Structural Engineer, 76(11): 213–20.
               Bolt, B.A. (1993) Earthquakes, W.H. Freeman, New York.
               Borcherdt, R.D. (1994) ‘Estimates of site-dependent response spectra for design (methodology and
                 justification)’, Earthquake Spectra, 10(4): 617–53.
               Bruneau, M., Uang, C-M. and Whittaker, A.S. (1998) Ductile Design of Steel Structures, McGraw-
                 Hill, New York.
               CEN (1994a) Techn. Comm. 250/SC8 Eurocode 8, Design Provisions for Earthquake Resistance of
                 Structures: Part 1, General Rules—Seismic Actions and General Requirements for Structures (ENV
                 1998–1–1), CEN, Brussels.
               CEN (1994b) Techn. Comm. 250/SC8 Eurocode 8, Design Provisions for Earthquake Resistance of
                 Structures: Part 1, General Rules—General Rules for Buildings (ENV 1998–1-2). CEN, Brussels.
               CEN (1994c) Techn. Comm. 250/SC8 Eurocode 8, Design Provisions for Earthquake Resistance of
                 Structures: Part 2, Bridges (ENV 1998–2). CEN, Brussels.
               Chopra, A.K. (1995) The Dynamics of Structures: Theory and Applications to Earthquake
                 Engineering, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
               Clough, R.W. and Penzien, J. (1993) Dynamics of Structures, 2nd edn, McGraw-Hill, New York.
   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201