Page 166 - Dynamics and Control of Nuclear Reactors
P. 166

12.15 Example of a PWR simulation     163




                                    Linearized Model Response: delta-Tcl = 5 deg F
                       0

                    –0.01

                    –0.02
                   Fractional reactor power, delta-P/Po  –0.04
                    –0.03



                    –0.05

                    –0.06

                    –0.07

                    –0.08

                    –0.09

                     –0.1
                        0    10    20    30    40    50    60    70    80   90    100
                                                   Time (s)
                  FIG. 12.14
                  Example of a PWR response to a+5°F core inlet coolant temperature step.



                     The purpose of this example is to illustrate the reactor response to a perturbation
                  in the coolant/moderator inlet temperature and the resulting effect of fuel tempera-
                  ture and moderator temperature feedback effects. Fig. 12.13 shows an initial
                  decrease in the fractional reactor power due to a quick increase in the coolant tem-
                  perature caused by the coolant temperature reactivity feedback effect. The decrease
                  in power causes the fuel temperature to decrease and as a result the power starts to
                  increase due to Doppler feedback. The combination of increase in moderator temper-
                  ature and decrease in fuel temperature brings the reactor power to a steady state
                  value. Note that this final steady-state power level is less than the initial level by
                    5.5%. The PWR is again stable under a coolant inlet temperature perturbation
                  without any control action.
                     This example illustrates the dynamic behavior of reactor power, fuel temperature,
                  and coolant node temperatures and the effect of temperature feedbacks in stabilizing
                  the reactor response.
                     Frequency responses were also calculated for the linear core model. Details
                  appear in Appendix J. Figs. 12.15 and 12.16 (from Appendix J) show the power/
                  reactivity frequency response gain and phase.
   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171