Page 14 - Effective Communication Skills by Dalton Kehoe
P. 14

The Complex Layers of Face-to-Face Talk
                                  Lecture 2



            Interpersonal communication is a process whereby two or more people
            within a particular context and who are aware of each other act together
            to create and manage shared meetings. All of this goes on through
            nonconscious display or conscious sending and receiving of messages
            using a shared repertoire of both verbal and nonverbal symbols.

              he model of face-to-face communication developed by
              communication theorists and researchers over the past 50 years
        Treveals what is actually happening as we talk with one another.
        It turns out that what we say between the lines about ourselves and our
        relationship to the other actually shapes the meaning of the lines we deliver
        about the conversational topic. This is an important revelation because it
        helps to explain why we are effective communicators in some situations and
        not in others.
      Lecture 2: The Complex Layers of Face-to-Face Talk
        By the 1950s, we had put together a basic model that says every face-to-face
        moment has a sender, a message, channels, and a receiver. We also added
        two additional concepts: noise (anything that interferes with the sending
        of a message) and feedback (the receiver’s immediate verbal response to
        whatever the sender said). As the model began to work, scientists came to
        recognize that what’s in people’s heads actually isn’t noise but rather their
        personal experience. What the receiver got from our words may not be our
        meanings but the meanings they put into the words as they were coming in.

        What’s interesting about this is it shifts our focus from the sender to the
        receiver. After 2,000 years of rhetorical analysis focused on the sender, we
        put the receiver—the other—at the center of our analysis. As our thinking
        and research progressed, we also realized we needed to move away from our
        traditional emphasis on words to a focus on the relationship between words
        and nonverbal displays in our analysis of the continuous and simultaneous

        Àow of messages.



        6
   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19