Page 272 - Effective group discussion theory and practice by Adams, Katherine H. Brilhart, John K. Galanes, Gloria J

Problem Solving and Decision Making in Groups 255

Processes, ed. P. B. Paulus (New York: Springer- Decision- Making,” Southern Communication
Verlag, 1983): 19–20; Randy Y. Hirokawa, Journal, 62 (Summer 1997): 269–79.
“ Consensus Group Decision Making, Quality of 20. Kathleen M. Propp and Daniel Nelson, “Problem-
Decision and Group Satisfaction: An Attempt to Solving Performance in Naturalistic Groups: A Test
Sort Fact from Fiction,” Central States Speech of the Ecological Validity of the Functional Perspec-
Journal, 33 (1982): 407–15. tive,” Communication Studies, 47 (Spring/Summer
8. Lester Coch and John R. P. French, Jr., “Overcom- 1996): 35–45.
ing Resistance to Change,” Human Relations, 1 21. Scudder, Herschel, and Crossland, “Test of a
(1948): 512–32. Model.”
9. Myron W. Block and L. R. Hoffman, “The Effects 22. Maritza R. Salazar, Therese K. Lant, Stephen
of Valence of Solutions and Group Cohesiveness on M. Fiore, and Eduardo Salas, “Facilitating Innova-
Members’ Commitment to Group Decision,” in The tion in Diverse Science Teams through Integrative
Group Problem Solving Process, ed. L. Richard Capacity,” Small Group Research, 43 (October,
Hoffman (New York: Prager, 1979): 121. 2012): 527–58.
10. Herm W. Smith, “Group versus Individual Problem 23. Michaéla C. Schippers, Amy C. Edmondson, and
Solving and Type of Problem Solved,” Small Group Michael A. West, “Team Reflexivity as Antidote to
Behavior, 20 (1989): 357–66. Team Information- Processing Failures,” Small
11. Michael Pacanowsky, “Team Tools for Wicked Group Research, 45 (December 2014): 731–69;
Problems,” Organizational Dynamics, 23 (Winter Yuhyung Shin, “Positive Group Affect and Team
1995): 36–51. Creativity: Mediation of Team Reflexivity and
12. Abran J. Salazar, Randy Y. Hirokawa, Kathleen Promotion Focus,” Small Group Research, 45 (June
M. Propp, Kelly M. Julian, and Geoff B. Leatham, 2014): 337–64.
“In Search of True Causes: Examination of the 24. Michael E. Mayer, “Behaviors Leading to More
Effect of Group Potential and Group Interaction on Effective Decisions in Small Groups Embedded in
Group Performance,” Human Communication Organizations,” Communication Reports, 11
Research, 20 (June 1994): 529–59. (Summer 1998): 123–32.
13. Deborah H. Gruenfeld and Andrea B. Hollingshead, 25. Shin, “Positive Group Affect.”
“Sociocognition in Work Groups: The Evolution of 26. Milton Mayfield and Jacqueline Mayfield, “The
Group Integrative Complexity and Its Relation to Effects of Leader Motivating Language Use on
Task Performance,” Small Group Research, 24 Employee Decision Making,” International Journal
(August 1993): 383–405. of Business Communication, 53 (2016): 465–84.
14. Joseph N. Scudder, Richard T. Herschel, and 27. Marcial Losada and Emily Heaphy, “The Role of
Martin D. Crossland, “Test of a Model Linking Positivity and Connectivity in the Performance of
Cognitive Motivation, Assessment of Alternatives, Business Teams: A Nonlinear Dynamics Model,”
Decision Quality, and Group Process Satisfaction,” American Behavioral Scientist, 47 (2004): 740–65.
Small Group Research, 25 (February 1994): 57–82. 28. Irving L. Janis and Leon Mann, Decision Making:
15. Laughlin, VanderSteop, and Hollingshead, A Psychological Analysis of Conflict, Choice, and
“ Collective versus Individual Induction.” Commitment (New York: Free Press, 1977); Irving
16. Burleson, Levine, and Samter, “Decision Making L. Janis, Groupthink: Psychological Studies of
Procedure and Decision Quality.” Foreign- Policy Decisions and Fiascoes, 2nd ed.
17. Salazar, Hirokawa, Propp, Julian, and Leatham, “In (Boston: Houghton- Mifflin, 1983).
Search of True Causes.” 29. Susan Jarboe, “Procedures for Enhancing Group
18. Michael E. Mayer, Kevin T. Sonoda, and William Decision Making,” in Communication and Group
B. Gudykunst, “The Effect of Time Pressure and Decision Making, 2nd ed., eds. Randy Y. Hirokawa
Type of Information on Decision Quality,” Southern and Marshall Scott Poole (Thousand Oaks, CA:
Communication Journal, 62 (Summer 1997): Sage, 1996): 345–83.
280–92. 30. John K. Brilhart, “An Experimental Comparison of
19. Elizabeth E. Graham, Michael J. Papa, and Mary Three Techniques for Communicating a Problem-
B. McPherson, “An Applied Test of the Functional Solving Pattern to Members of a Discussion
Communication Perspective of Small Group Group,” Speech Monographs, 33 (1966): 168–77.

gal37018_ch09_225_258.indd 255 3/28/18 12:37 PM