Page 273 - Effective group discussion theory and practice by Adams, Katherine H. Brilhart, John K. Galanes, Gloria J
P. 273

256                 Chapter 9

                31.  Thomas M. Scheidel and Laura Crowell,       Randy Y. Hirokawa, “Effective Decision Making
                   “ Developmental Sequences in Small Groups,”   and Problem Solving in Groups: A Functional Per-
                     Quarterly Journal of Speech, 50 (1964): 140–45.  spective,” in Small Group Communication, Theory
                32.  Dennis S. Gouran, Candace Brown, and David   and Practice: An Anthology, eds. Randy Y. Hirokawa,
                   R. Henry, “Behavioral Correlates of Perceptions of   Robert S. Cathcart, Larry A. Samovar, and Linda
                   Quality in Decision- Making Discussions,” Commu-  D. Henman (Los Angeles, CA: Roxbury, 2003):
                   nication Monographs, 45 (1978): 62; William   27–38. Other relevant sources include Dennis
                   E. Jurma, “Effects of Leader Structuring Style and   S. Gouran and Randy Y. Hirokawa, “Functional
                   Task Orientation Characteristics of Group     Theory and Communication in Decision- Making
                     Members,” Communication Monographs, 46 (1979):   and Problem- Solving Groups: An Expanded View,”
                   282–95.                                       in Communication and Group Decision Making,
                33.  Jurma, “Effects of Leader Structuring Style.”  2nd ed., eds. R. Y. Hirokawa and M. S. Poole
                34.  Marshall S. Poole, “Decision Development in Small   (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1996): 55–80; Randy
                   Groups II: A Study of Multiple Sequences in   Y. Hirokawa, “Communication and Group Decision
                     Decision Making,” Communication Monographs, 50   Making Efficacy,” in Small Group Communication:
                   (1983): 224–25; “Decision Development in Small   A Reader, 6th ed., eds. Robert S. Cathcart and
                   Groups III: A Multiple Sequence Model of Group   Larry A. Samovar (Dubuque, IA: Wm. C. Brown,
                   Decision Development,” Communication          1992): 165–77; Randy Y. Hirokawa and Kathryn
                     Monographs, 50 (1983): 321–41.              Rost, “Effective Group Decision Making in Organi-
                35.  John K. Brilhart and Lurene M. Jochem, “Effects   zations: A Field Test of the Vigilant Interaction
                   of Different Patterns on Outcomes of Problem-   Theory,” Management Communication Quarterly, 5
                   Solving Discussions,” Journal of Applied Psychology,   (February 1992): 267–88; Randy Y. Hirokawa,
                   48 (1964): 175–79.                            “Group Communication and Decision- Making Per-
                36.  Ovid L. Bayless, “An Alternative Model for   formance: A Continued Test of the Functional Per-
                   Problem- Solving Discussion,” Journal of Communi-  spective,” Human Communication Research, 14
                   cation, 17 (1967): 188–97; Carl E. Larson, “Forms   (1988): 487–515; Dennis S. Gouran, “Inferential
                   of Analysis and Small Group Problem Solving,”   Errors, Interaction, and Group Decision Making,”
                   Speech Monographs, 36 (1969): 452–55.         in Communication and Group Decision Making, eds.
                37.  Charles M. Kelly, Michael Jaffe, and Gregory   R. Y. Hirokawa and M. S. Poole (Beverly Hills, CA:
                   V. Nelson, “Solving Problems,” Research Manage-  Sage, 1986): 93–111; Randy Y. Hirokawa, “Discus-
                   ment, 30 (1987): 20–23.                       sion Procedures and Decision- Making Performance:
                38.  Ibid.                                       A Test of the Functional Perspective,” Human
                39.  Benjamin J. Broome and Luann Fulbright, “A     Communication Research, 12 (1985): 59–74; Randy
                   Multi- Stage Influence Model of Barriers to Group   Y. Hirokawa, “Group Communication and Problem-
                   Problem Solving: A Participant- Generated Agenda   Solving Effectiveness II: An Exploratory Investiga-
                   for Small Group Research, Small Group Research,   tion of Procedural Functions,” Western Journal of
                   26 (February 1995): 25–55.                    Speech Communication, 47 (1983), 59–74.
                40.  Laura A. Hambley, Thomas A. O’Neill, and The-   43.  Gouran and Hirokawa, “Effective Decision Making
                   resa J. B. Kline, “Virtual Team Leadership: Perspec-  and Problem Solving in Groups.”
                   tives from the Field,” International Journal of    44.  Randy Y. Hirokawa, “Group Communication and
                   e- Collaboration, 3 (2007): 40–64; Joseph B. Walther   Problem- Solving Effectiveness II”; Marshall
                   and Ulla Bunz, “The Rules of Virtual Groups:   S. Poole and Joel A. Doelger, “Developmental Pro-
                   Trust, Liking and Performance in Computer-    cesses in Group Decision- Making,” in Communica-
                   Mediated Communication,” Journal of Communica-  tion and Group Decision Making, eds.
                   tion, (2005): 828–846.                        R. Y. Hirokawa and M. S. Poole (Newbury Park,
                41.  Randy Y. Hirokawa, “Why Informed Groups Make   CA: Sage, 1986): 35–61.
                   Faulty Decisions,” Small Group Research, 18    45.  Hirokawa and Rost, “Effective Group Decision
                   (1987): 3–29.                                 Making,” 20–22.
                42.  The principles of the Functional Perspective are    46.  Kathleen M. Propp and Daniel Nelson, “Problem-
                   summarized succinctly in Dennis S. Gouran and   Solving Performance in Naturalistic Groups: A Test







          gal37018_ch09_225_258.indd   256                                                              3/28/18   12:37 PM
   268   269   270   271   272   273   274   275   276   277   278