Page 306 - Effective group discussion theory and practice by Adams, Katherine H. Brilhart, John K. Galanes, Gloria J
P. 306

Problem Solving and Decision Making in Groups         289

                      29.  Randy Y. Hirokawa, “Discussion Procedures and   the Field,” International Journal of e-Collaboration,
                        Decision-Making Performance: A Test of the    3 (January-March 2007): 40–64.
                        Functional Perspective,” Human Communication    42.  Judith Pena-Shaff, Wendy Martin, and Geraldine
                        Research, 12 (1985): 203–24.                  Gay, “An Epistemological Framework for Analyzing
                      30.  Randy Y. Hirokawa, “Group Decision-Making   Student Interactions in Computer-Mediated
                        Performance: A Continued Test of the Functional   Communication Environments,” Journal of Interactive
                        Perspective,” Human Communication Research, 14   Learning Research, 12 (Spring 2001): 41–62.
                        (1988): 487–515.                           43.  Ibid.
                      31.  Norman R. F. Maier, Problem-Solving Discussions    44.  Ibid.
                        and Conferences: Leadership Methods and Skills    45.  Ibid.
                        (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1963): 171–77.     46.  Hambley, O’Neill, and Kline, “Virtual Team
                      32.  Koerber and Neck, “An Application of Whyte’s   Leadership.”
                        Model.”                                    47.  Tyrone Adams and Norman Clark, The Internet:
                      33.  David R. Siebold, “Making Meetings More    Effective Online Communication (Fort Worth, TX:
                        Successful: Plans, Formats, and Procedures for   Harcourt, 2001): 105–07.
                        Group Problem Solving,” in Small Group     48.  Hambley, O’Neill, and Kline, “Virtual Team
                        Communication: A Reader, 6th ed., eds. Robert   Leadership.”
                        S. Cathcart and Larry A. Samovar (Dubuque, IA:    49.  John A. Short, Ederyn Williams, and Bruce
                        Wm. C. Brown, 1992): 187.                     Christie, The Social Psychology of
                      34.  Annika Wiebow and Udo Konradt, “Two-dimensional   Telecommunications (London: Wiley, 1976).
                        Structure of Team Process Improvement: Team    50.  Starr Roxanne Hiltz, Kenneth Johnson, and Murray
                        Reflection and Team Adaptation,” Small Group   Turoff, “Experiments in Group Decision Making:
                        Research, 42 (2011): 32–54.                   Communication Process and Outcome in Face-to-
                      35.  Marvin E. Shaw, Group Dynamics, 3rd ed.    Face versus Computerized Conferences,” Human
                        (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1981): 364.           Communication Research, 13 (1986): 225–52.
                      36.  See, for example, John K. Brilhart and Lurene    51.  Sharon L. Murrell, “The Impact of Communicating
                        M. Jochem, “Effects of Different Patterns on   Through Computers” (Unpublished doctoral disser-
                        Outcomes of Problem-Solving Procedures,” Journal   tation, State University of New York at Stony
                        of Applied Psychology, 48 (1964): 175–179; Ovid   Brook, 1983).
                        L. Bayless, “An Alternative Model for Problem-   52.  Vitaly J. Dubrovsky, Sara Kiesler, and Beheruz
                        Solving Discussion,” Journal of Communication, 17   N. Sethna, “The Equalization Phenomenon: Status
                        (1967): 188–97; and Sidney J. Parnes and Arnold   Effects in Computer-Mediated and Face-to-Face
                        Meadow, “Effects of ‘Brainstorming’ Instruction on   Decision-Making Groups,” Human Computer
                        Creative Problem Solving by Trained and Untrained   Interaction, 6 (1991): 119–46.
                        Subjects,” Journal of Educational Psychology, 50    53.  Starr Roxanne Hiltz, Kenneth Johnson, and Murray
                        (1959): 171–76.                               Turoff, “Experiments in Group Decision Making, 3:
                      37.  Shaw, Group Dynamics, 364.                 Disinhibition, Deindividuation, and Group Process
                      38.  Leonard Berkowitz, “Sharing Leadership in Small   in Pen Name and Real Name Computer
                        Decision-Making Groups,” Journal of Abnormal and   Conferences,” Decision Support Systems, 5 (June
                        Social Psychology, 48 (1953): 231–38.         1989): 217–32.
                      39.  James H. Davis, Group Performance (Reading, MA:    54.  Sara Keisler and Lee Sproull, “Group Decision
                        Addison-Wesley 1969).                         Making and Computer Technology,” Organizational
                      40.  Annette C. Easton, Nancy S. Eickelmann, and   Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 52 (June
                        Marie E. Flatley, “Effects of an Electronic Meeting   1992): 96–123.
                        System Group Writing Tool on the Quality of    55.  David H. Jonassen and Hyug II Kwon,
                        Written Documents,” Journal of Business       “Communication Patterns in Computer Mediated
                        Communication, 31 (1) (1994): 27–40.          Versus Face-to-Face Group Problem Solving,”
                      41.  Laura Hambley, Thomas O’Neill, and Theresa   Educational Technology Research and Development,
                        Kline, “Virtual Team Leadership: Perspectives from   49 (March 2001): 35–51.









          gal37018_ch10_259_290.indd   289                                                              3/30/18   11:14 AM
   301   302   303   304   305   306   307   308   309   310   311