Page 40 - Earth's Climate Past and Future
P. 40

16      PART I • Framework of Climate Science



                              BOX 1-2  CLIMATE INTERACTIONS AND FEEDBACKS
                                    Positive and Negative Feedbacks


            he strength of a feedback on temperature, called the  If f has a value of 1, no feedback exists. If the value of f
          Tfeedback factor, or f, is defined as             is greater than 1, the net temperature change is larger than
                                                            it would be without any feedback, and the climate system
                    temperature change with feedback
                 f =                                        is characterized as having a positive feedback. If the value
                    temperature change without feedback
                                                            of f is less than 1, the temperature change is smaller than it
          where “temperature change” refers to the full equilibrium  would be in the absence of any feedback, and the climate
          response.                                         system is characterized as having a negative feedback.


        components of the climate system. The changes in    greenhouse gases (p. 10)  positive feedbacks (p. 15)
        some of these components will then further perturb cli-  response time (p. 10)  negative feedbacks
        mate through the action of feedbacks.               equilibrium (p. 11)        (p. 15)
           Positive feedbacks produce additional climate
        change beyond that triggered by the factor that initiates  feedbacks (p. 15)  feedback factor (p. 16)
        the change (Box 1-2). For example, a decrease in the
        amount of heat energy sent to Earth by the Sun would
        allow snow and ice to spread across high-latitude    Review Questions
        regions that had not previously been covered. Because  1. How does climate differ from weather?
        snow and ice reflect far more sunlight (heat energy)
        than do bare ground or open ocean water, an increase in  2. In what ways does climate science differ from
        their extent should decrease the amount of heat taken   traditional sciences such as chemistry and
        up by Earth’s surface and further cool the climate in   biology?
        those regions.                                       3. How does climate forcing differ from climate
           The positive feedback process also works in the      response?
        opposite direction. If more energy from the Sun arrives
        and causes climate to warm, high-latitude snow and ice  4. In the example in which the Bunsen burner is lit
        will retreat and allow more sunlight to be absorbed.    and the beaker of water at first warms quickly and
        The result will be further climatic warming. Positive   then more slowly, how does the response time of
        feedback acts as an amplifier, regardless of the direction  the water change through time?
        of change.                                           5. The climate system consists of many components
           Negative feedbacks work in the opposite sense, by    with different response times. What is the total
        muting climate changes (see Figure 1-11). When an ini-  range of time scales over which these responses
        tial climate change is triggered, some components of    vary?
        Earth’s climate system respond in such a way as to
        reduce the initial change.                           6. Do positive feedbacks always make the climate
                                                                warmer?
          Key Terms
                                                             Additional Resources
        climate (p. 4)            theory (p. 8)
        weather (p. 4)            evolution (p. 8)          Basic Reading
        Fahrenheit (p. 5)         plate tectonics (p. 8)    Climate Change: State of Knowledge. 1997. Washington,
        Celsius (p. 5)            climate system (p. 8)       DC: Office of Science and Technology Policy.
                                                            Understanding Climate Change. 1975. Washington, DC:
        Kelvin (p. 5)             forcing (p. 8)
                                                              U.S. National Academy of Science.
        resolution (p. 6)         response (p. 8)
        Earth system (p. 7)       radiation (p. 10)         Advanced Reading
        climate science (p. 8)    anthropogenic forcing     Imbrie, J. 1985. “A Theoretical Framework for the Ice
        hypothesis (p. 8)          (p. 10)                    Ages.” Journal of the Geological Society 142: 417–32.
   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45