Page 131 - Educational Technology A Primer for the 21st Century

7.4 Analysis and Measure Social Learning 121
• Making group-work work: practical examples of engaging students in
technology-basedsocial learning, Web site: https://www.sheffield.ac.uk/lets/cpd/
conf/conf/conf12-9
• Making small-group teaching work. Race, P. (2006). The Lecturer’s Toolkit:
3rd Edition London: Routledge. Web site: http://phil-race.co.uk/downloads/
• Approaches to small group teaching. Gunn, V. (2007). University of Glasgow.
Web site: www.gla.ac.uk/media/media_12157_en.pdf
• Teaching Methods: Small Group Teaching The University of Nottingham offers
a series of video interviews with academic staff on different teaching issues,
including teaching small groups. Web site: http://www.nottingham.ac.uk/pesl/
• Assessing Group Work The Centre for the Study of Higher Education explores
some of the benefits and challenges of group work, including group formation,
group processes and procedures and assessment. Web site: https://teaching.
unsw.edu.au/assessing-group-work

References

Bandura, A. (1962). Social learning through imitation. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
Bandura, A., & Walters, R. H. (1963). Social learning and personality development. New York:
Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Brindley, J. E., Walti, C., & Blaschke, L. M. (2009). Creating effective collaborative learning
groups in an online environment. International Review of Research in Open & Distance
Learning, 10(3), 1–18.
Chapman, C., Ramondt, L., & Smiley, G. (2005). Strong community, deep learning: Exploring the
link. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 47(3), 217–230.
Cho, H., Gay, G., Davidson, B., & Ingraffea, A. (2007). Social networks, communication styles,
and learning performance in a CSCL community. Computers & Education, 49(2), 309–329.
Clark, R. E., & Estes, F. (1996). Cognitive task analysis. International Journal of Education
Research., 25, 403–417.
Dreyer, E., & Harder, K. (2009). 99 Tipps Partner-und Gruppenarbeit. Berlin:Cornelsen
Schulverlage GmbH.
Haythornthwaite, C., & De Laat, M. (2010, May). Social networks and learning networks: using
social network perspectives to understand social learning. Paper presented at the 7th
International Conference on Networked Learning, Aalborg, Denmark.
Jaewoo, C., & Woonsun, K. (2014). Themes and trends in Korean educational technology
research: A social network analysis of keywords. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences,
131, 171–176.
Laal, M., & Ghodsi, S. M. (2012). Benefits of collaborative learning. Procedia - Social and
Behavioral Sciences, 31(2), 486–490.
Lai, C. L., & Hwang, G. J. (2015). An interactive peer-assessment criteria development approach to
improving students’ art design performance using handheld devices. Computer & Education,
85, 149–159.
Mislevy, R. J., Steinberg, L. S., & Almond, R. G. (2003). Focus article: on the structure of educational
assessments. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 1(1), 3–62.
Muro, M., & Jeffrey, P. (2008). A critical review of the theory and application of social learning in
participatory natural resource management. Journal of Environmental Planning and Manage-
ment, 51, 325–344.