Page 122 - Effective group discussion theory and practice by Adams, Katherine H. Brilhart, John K. Galanes, Gloria J
P. 122

Diversity and the Effects of Culture       105

                       4.  C. W. Von Bergen, Barlow Soper, and Teresa Foster,    13.  Mary Jane Collier and Milt Thomas, “Cultural
                        “Unintended Negative Effects of Diversity     Identity: An Interpretive Perspective,” in Theories in
                        Management,” Public Personnel Management, 31   Intercultural Communication: International and
                        (Summer 2002). Accessed on Internet, July 20, 2002.  Intercultural Communication Annual, Vol. 12, eds.
                       5.  John M. Ivancevich and Jacqueline A. Gilbert,   Young Yun Kim and William B. Gudykunst
                        “Diversity Management,” Public Personnel      (Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1988).
                        Management, 29 (Spring, 2000). Accessed on    14.  Mark P. Orbe, “From the Standpoint(s) of
                        Internet July 20, 2002.                       Traditionally Muted Groups: Explicating a Co-
                       6.  Beth Bonniwell Haslett and Jenn Ruebush, “What   cultural Communication Theoretical Model,”
                        Differences Do Individual Differences in Groups   Communication Theory, 8 (February, 1998): 1– 26.
                        Make?” in The Handbook of Group Communication    15.  Ibid., 2.
                        Theory and Research, ed. Lawrence R. Frey    16.  Donald W. Klopf, Intercultural Encounters: The
                        (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1999): 115– 38.     Fundamentals of Intercultural Communication
                       7.  G. M. Parker, Team Players and Teamwork: The New   (Englewood, CO: Morton, 1987): 27– 30.
                        Competitive Business Strategy (San Francisco, CA:    17.  Sarbaugh, “A Taxonomic Approach to Intercultural
                        Jossey- Bass, 1990); R. A. Eisenstat, “Fairfield   Communication,” in Theories in Intercultural
                        Systems Group,” in Groups That Work and Those   Communication: International and Intercultural
                        That Don’t, ed. J. R. Hackman (San Francisco, CA:   Communication Annual, Vol. 12, eds. Young Yun
                        Jossey- Bass, 1990): 171– 81.                 Kim and William B. Gudykunst (Newbury Park,
                       8.  Martha L. Maznevski, “Understanding Our    CA: Sage, 1988): 22– 38.
                        Differences: Performance in Decision- Making    18.  Young Yun Kim, “On Theorizing Intercultural
                        Groups with Diverse Members,” Human Relations,   Communication,” in Theories in Intercultural
                        47 (May 1994): 531– 52; Haslett and Ruebush,   Communication: International and Intercultural
                        “What Differences Do Individual Differences in   Communication Annual, Vol. 12, eds. Young Yun
                        Groups Make?”                                 Kim and William B. Gudykunst (Newbury Park,
                       9.  Poppy Lauretta McLeod, Sharon Alisa Lobel, and   CA: Sage, 1988): 12– 13.
                        Taylor H. Cox, Jr., “Ethnic Diversity and Creativity    19.  E. Glenn (with C. G. Glenn), Man and Mankind:
                        in Small Groups,” Small Groups Research, 27 (May   Conflict and Communication Between Cultures
                        1996): 248– 64.                               (Norwood, NJ: Ablex, 1981); Edward T. Hall,
                      10.  Young Yun Kim and Brent D. Ruben, “Intercultural   Beyond Culture (New York: Anchor Press, 1977);
                        Transformation: A Systems Theory,” in Theories in   Geert Hofstede, Culture’s Consequences: International
                        Intercultural Communication: International and   Differences in Work- Related Values (Beverly Hills,
                        Intercultural Communication Annual, Vol. 12, eds.   CA: Sage, 1980); F. Kluckhohn and F. Strodtbeck,
                        Young Yun Kim and William B. Gudykunst        Variations in Value Orientations (New York: Row,
                        (Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1988): 299– 321.     Peterson, 1961); Charles H. Kraft, “Worldview in
                      11.  See, for example, John G. Oetzel, “Culturally   Intercultural Communication,” in Intercultural and
                        Homogeneous and Heterogeneous Groups:         International Communication, ed. Fred L. Casmir
                        Explaining Communication Processes Through    (Washington, DC: University Press of America,
                        Individualism- Collectivism and Self- Construal,”   1978): 407– 28; Sarbaugh, “A Taxonomic Approach
                        International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 22   to Intercultural Communication.”
                        (May 1998): 135– 61; Kim M. Shapcott, Albert    20.  William B. Gudykunst and Stella Ting- Toomey,
                        V. Carron, and Paul A. Estabrooks, “Member    Culture and Interpersonal Communication (Newbury
                        Diversity and Cohesion and Performance in     Park, CA: Sage, 1988): 40– 43.
                        Walking Groups,” Small Group Research, 37    21.  Min- Sun Kim and William F. Sharkey,
                        (December 2006): 701– 20.                     “Independent and Interdependent Construals of
                      12.  Kacie Axsome, “Uprooted Katrina Evacuees Adjust   Self: Explaining Cultural Patterns of Interpersonal
                        to ‘Burgh life,’” Pittsburgh Tribune (September 1,   Communication in Multi- Cultural Organizational
                        2007). Retrieved June 11, 2008, from www.     Settings,” Communication Quarterly, 43 (Winter
                        pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/s_525237.html.  1995): 20– 38.









          gal37018_ch04_075_108.indd   105                                                              3/28/18   12:35 PM
   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127