Page 123 - Effective group discussion theory and practice by Adams, Katherine H. Brilhart, John K. Galanes, Gloria J

106 Chapter 4

22. Hofstede, Culture’s Consequences. 38. Foeman and Pressley, “Ethnic Culture and
23. Myron W. Lustig and Laura L. Cassotta, Corporate Culture,” 295– 307.
“Comparing Group Communication Across 39. Mark P. Orbe, “Remember, It’s Always Whites’
Cultures: Leadership, Conformity, and Discussion Ball.”
Procedures,” in Small Group Communication: A 40. Tarik Abdel- Monem, Shereen Bingham, Jamie
Reader, 6th ed., eds. Robert S. Cathcart and Larry Marincic, and Alan Tomkins, “Deliberation and
A. Samovar (Dubuque, IA: Wm. C. Brown, 1992): Diversity: Perceptions of Small Group Discussions
393– 404. by Race and Ethnicity,” Small Group Research 41
24. Hofstede, Culture’s Consequences. (2010): 746– 76.
25. Myron W. Lustig and Jolene Koester, Intercultural 41. Nina Reich and Julia Wood, “Sex, Gender and
Competence: Interpersonal Communication across Communication in Small Groups,” in Small Group
Cultures (New York: HarperCollins, 1993). Communication: Theory and Practice, 8th ed., eds.
26. Lustig and Cassotta, “Comparing Group Randy Hirokawa, Robert Cathcart, Larry Samavar,
Communication across Cultures.” and Linda Henman (Los Angeles, CA: Roxbury,
27. Hofstede, Culture’s Consequences. 2003): 218– 29.
28. Lustig and Cassotta, “Comparing Group 42. Kathleen M. Propp, “An Experimental Examination
Communication across Cultures.” of Biological Sex as a Status Cue in Decision-
29. Hall, Beyond Culture. Making Groups and Its Influence on Information
30. Linda Wai Ling Young, “Inscrutability Revisited,” Use,” Small Group Research, 26 (November 1995):
in Language and Social Identity, ed. John 451– 74.
J. Gumperz (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge 43. Judith Taps and Patricia Y. Martin, “Gender
University Press, 1982): 79. Composition, Attributional Accounts, and
31. Gudykunst and Ting- Toomey, Culture and Women’s Influence and Likability in Task Groups,”
Interpersonal Communication, 45. Small Group Research, 21 (November 1990):
32. Roichi Okabe, “Cultural Assumptions of East and 471– 91.
West,” in Intercultural Communication Theory: 44. Amy E. Randel and Kimberly S. Jaussi, “Gender
International & Intercultural Communication Annual, Social and Personal Identity, Sex Dissimilarity,
Vol. 7, ed. William B. Gudykunst (Beverly Hills, Relationship Conflict, and Asymmetrical Effects,”
CA: Sage, 1983): 21– 44. Small Group Research 39 (August 2008): 468– 91.
33. Donald W. Klopf, “Japanese Communication 45. Andrew J. Flanagin, Vanessa Tiyaamornwong, Joan
Practices: Recent Comparative Research,” O’Connor, and David R. Seibold, “Computer-
Communication Quarterly, 39 (Spring 1991): Mediated Group Work: The Interaction of Member
130– 43. Sex and Anonymity,” Communication Research, 29
34. Rebecca Leonard and Don C. Locke, (February 2002): 66– 93.
“Communication Stereotypes: Is Interracial 46. Priya Raghubir and Ana Valenzuela, “Male– Female
Communication Possible?” Journal of Black Dynamics in Groups: A Field Study of The Weakest
Studies, 23, (1993): 332–343. Link,” Small Group Research 41 (2010): 41– 70.
35. Mark P. Orbe, “Remember, It’s Always Whites’ Ball: 47. Jeff Youngquist, “The Effect of Interruptions and
Descriptions of African American Male Dyad Gender Combination on Perceptions of
Communication,” Communication Quarterly, 42 Interpersonal Dominance,” Communication Studies
(Summer 1994): 287– 300. 60 (April- June 2009): 147– 63.
36. Anita K. Foeman and Gary Pressley, “Ethnic 48. Daniel Canary and Brian Spitzberg,
Culture and Corporate Culture: Using Black Styles “Appropriateness and Effectiveness Perceptions of
in Organizations,” Communication Quarterly, 35 Conflict Strategies, Human Communication
(Fall 1987): 293– 307. Research, 14 (1987): 93– 118.
37. Penington, Barbara A. “Communicative 49. Lindsey Grob, Renee A. Meyers, and Renee Schuh,
Management of Connection and Autonomy in “Powerful/Powerless Language Use in Group
African American and European American Interactions: Sex Differences or Similarities?”
Mother– Daughter Relationships,” Journal of Family Communication Quarterly, 45 (Summer 1997):
Communication, 4 (2004): 3– 34. 282– 303.

gal37018_ch04_075_108.indd 106 3/28/18 12:35 PM