Page 39 - Electrical Installation in Hazardous Area
P. 39

18  Electrical installations in hazardous areas


                     Table 1.2 Relationship of  temperature classi-
                              fication systems
                                         ~~   ~~~
                     European and UK     German     USA

                     T1                 G1          T1
                     T2                 G2          T2
                      -                  -          T2A (280°C)
                      -                  -          T2B (260°C)
                      -                  -          T2C (230°C)
                      -                  -          T2D (215°C)
                     T3                 G3          T3
                      -                  -          T3A (180 "C)
                      -                  -          T3B (165°C)
                      -                  -          T3C (160°C)
                     T4                 G4          T4
                      -                  -          T4A (120 "C)
                     T5                 G5          T5
                     T6                  -          T6

                     Note: Prior to the introduction of  a separate temperature
                     classification system in  the USA  temperature classifica-
                     tion was associated with the grouping system as follows:
                     Groups A, B and D were given a maximum temperature
                     of  280°C;  Group C was given a maximum temperature
                     of  180°C;  Groups E  and F were given a temperature of
                     200 "C; and Group G a temperature of  165°C.


                     1.8 The future of certification

                     As has been stated, the situation in regard  to certification is significantly
                     affected  by  the  1990  Directive"  which  came  into  force  early  in  1996.
                     While  this  will  initially  rely  on  European Standards  referred  to  in  the
                     European Journal12 it is certain that the breadth of the essential requirements
                     contained within the Directive"  will ultimately be used. As these essential
                     requirements are couched in much more general terms than the Standards,
                     then the approved bodies will have to revert to the expert interpretation of
                     more general requirements much as they did before the advent of  the more
                     detailed Standards. The level of expertise of the certification bodies will once
                     again, therefore, become of  paramount importance. To this end the HOTL
                     grouping will assume a much greater sigruficance and it is unlikely that it
                     will contain sufficient expertise without introducing industrial expertise into
                     it. How this can be done without making it as cumbersome as a Standards-
                     making body will no doubt become a matter for considerable debate in the
                     not too distant future.
                       The inclusion of  non-electrical equipment for which the level of  detailed
                     standardization in this area is much lower will mean that the problem of
                     certification to the requirements contained in the new  Directive"  will be
                     apparent much sooner. Not  only will the currently approved bodies not
   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44