Page 147 - Electrical Properties of Materials
P. 147

Extrinsic semiconductors                       129

            Table 8.1 Energy levels of donor (group V) and acceptor (group III) impur-
            ities in Ge and Si. The energies given are the ionization energies, that is, the
            distance of the impurity level from the band edge (in electron volts)

                               Impurity               Ge               Si
            Donors             Antimony (Sb)          0.0096           0.039
                               Phosphorus (P)         0.0120           0.045
                               Arsenic (As)           0.0127           0.049
            Acceptors          Indium (In)            0.0112           0.160
                               Gallium (Ga)           0.0108           0.065
                               Boron (B)              0.0104           0.045
                               Aluminium (Al)         0.0102           0.057



               Thus, this model leads to the following estimate:
                                                  2 2
                                            ∗ 4
                                  E g – E D = m e /8  h .             (8.26)
            Taking silicon as an example, for which m =0.58m (see Table 8.4) and ε r =12
                                             ∗
            (see Table 10.1), this energy level is smaller by a factor of 248 than the value
            of –13.6 eV given by eqn (4.21) for the hydrogen atom. That comes to 0.0548
            eV, not very far from the experimental figures in Table 8.1. Note, however, that
            the parameters in eqn (8.26) depend only on the properties of the host material,
            so this model cannot possibly say anything on how E g –E D varies with the type
            of dopant.
               If instead of a group V impurity we had some group III atoms, for example,
            indium (In), aluminium (Al), or boron (B), there would be an electron missing
            from one of the covalent bonds (see Fig. 8.4). If one electron is missing, there
            must be a hole present.
               Before going further, let me say a few words about holes. You might have
            been slightly confused by our rather inconsistent references to them. To clear
            this point—there are three equivalent representations of holes, and you can
            always (or nearly always) look at them in the manner most convenient under
            the circumstances.
               You may think of a hole as a full-blooded positive particle moving around
            in the crystal, or as an electron missing from the top of the valence band, or
            as the actual physical absence of an electron from a place where it would be
            desirable to have one.


                                               E
                             4                  g
                                                                             Fig. 8.4
                                                                             (a) In the case of a group III impurity
                                                                             one bonding electron is missing—
                      4      3      4                                        there is a ‘hole’ which any valence
                                                                             electron with a little surplus energy
                                               E
                                                A
                                                                             can fall into. (b) This shows in the
                             4                  0                            band representation as an acceptor
                                                                             level just above the valence
                       ) a (                   ) b (                         band edge.
   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152