Page 399 - Electrical Properties of Materials
P. 399

Surface energy                         381

            specific heat has a discontinuity. This is borne out by experiments as well, as
            shown in Fig. 14.9, where the specific heat of tin is plotted against temperature.
            The discontinuity occurs at the critical temperature T c =3.72 K.


            14.5 Surface energy
            The preceding thermodynamical analysis was based on perfect diamagnetism,
            that is, we assumed that our superconductor completely expelled the magnetic
            field. In practice this is not so, and it can not be so. The currents that are set
            up to exclude the magnetic field must occupy a finite volume, however small
            that might be. Thus, the magnetic field can also penetrate the superconductor
            to a small extent. But now we encounter a difficulty. If the magnetic field can
            penetrate to a finite distance, the Gibbs free energy of that particular layer will
            decrease, because it no longer has to perform work to exclude the magnetic
            field. The magnetic field is admitted, and we get a lower Gibbs free energy.
            Carrying this argument to its logical conclusion, it follows that the optimum
            arrangement for minimum Gibbs free energy (of the whole solid at a given
            temperature) should look like that shown in Fig. 14.10, where normal and su-
            perconducting layers alternate. The width of the superconducting layers, s,is
            small enough to permit penetration of the magnetic field, and the width of
            the normal region is even smaller, n   s. In this way the Gibbs free energy
            of the superconducting domains is lower because the magnetic field can pen-
            etrate, while the contribution of the normal domains to the total Gibbs free
            energy remains negligible, because the volume of the normal domains is small
            in comparison with the volume of the superconducting domains.
               Thus, a consistent application of our theory leads to a superconductor
            in which normal and superconducting layers alternate. Is this conclusion
            correct? Do we find these alternating domains experimentally? For some super-
            conducting materials we do; for some other superconducting materials we
            do not. Incidentally, when the first doubts arose about the validity of the
            simple thermodynamical treatment, all the experimental evidence available at
            the time suggested that no break-up could occur. We shall restrict the argu-
            ment to this historically authentic case for the moment. Theory suggests that


                           S    N S    N  S    N S    N  S    N S    N S    N















                                                                             Fig. 14.10
                                                                             Alternating superconducting and
                          s  n                                               normal layers.
   394   395   396   397   398   399   400   401   402   403   404