Page 678 - Encyclopedia of Business and Finance
P. 678

eobf_S  7/5/06  3:21 PM  Page 655


                                                                                            Scientific Management


                                                                 to classify and streamline the individual movement
                                                                 needed to perform jobs with the intent of finding “the one
                                                                 best way” to do them). Even Taylor protested this inter-
                                                                 pretation. In his view, using these techniques did not in
                                                                 itself constitute scientific management, because, as he put
                                                                 it, the main objective of scientific management was “to
                                                                 remove the causes for antagonism between the boss and
                                                                 the men who were under him.” Ironically, at times during
                                                                 his experimentation, Taylor achieved the opposite effect
                                                                 by creating antagonism.
                                                                    As Taylor made his techniques known, others began
                                                                 to contribute to the body of knowledge of scientific man-
                                                                 agement.  These theorists included Carl G. L. Barth
                                                                 (1860–1939), a mathematician and statistician who
                                                                 assisted Taylor in analytical work, and Henry L. Gantt
                                                                 (1861–1919), who invented the slide rule and created the
                                                                 Gantt chart. Another associate, Sanford E.  Thompson
                                                                 (1867–1949), developed the first decimal stopwatch. Wal-
                                                                 ter Shewhart eventually transformed industry with his sta-
                                                                 tistical concepts and his ability to bridge technical tools
                                                                 with a management system. Frank G. (1868–1924) and
                                                                 Lillian Gilbreth (1878–1972), aware of Taylor’s work in
                                                                 measurement and analysis, chose the ancient craft of
                                                                 bricklaying for analysis. It was assumed that productivity
                                                                 in bricklaying certainly should have reached its peak thou-
                Frederick Winslow Taylor (1856–1915). The father of the
                                                                 sands of years ago and nothing could be done to increase
                scientific method of management and job design. © BETTMANN/
                                                                 worker productivity. Yet the Gilbreths were able to show
                CORBIS
                                                                 that by following Taylor’s techniques and using proper
                                                                 management planning, productivity could be raised sig-
                                                                 nificantly and workers would be less tired than they were
                they would receive a substantial pay increase provided
                                                                 under the old system.
                they followed instructions. As a result, worker productiv-
                ity increased substantially.                        By 1912, the efficiency movement had gained
                                                                 momentum. Taylor was even called before a special com-
                   However, most of the short-sighted management of
                                                                 mittee of the House of Representatives that was investigat-
                that time would set certain standards, often paying by  ing scientific management and its impact on the railroad
                piece-rate for the work. Then, when a worker discovered  industry, whose members regarded it as a way to speed up
                how to produce more, management cut the rate. In turn,  work. Little did Taylor realize how workers would perceive
                the workers deliberately cut down on output, but manage-
                                                                 his effort at producing more efficiently. Taylor found out
                ment could do nothing about this. Taylor came to realize
                                                                 the importance of the cooperative spirit the hard way. He
                that the concept of division of labor had to be revamped
                                                                 was strictly the engineer at first. Only after painful experi-
                if greater productivity and efficiency were to be realized.
                                                                 ences did he realize that the human factor, the social sys-
                His vision included a superefficient assembly line as part  tem, and the mental attitude of people in both
                of a management system of operations. He, more than  management and labor had to be adjusted and changed
                anyone else at the time, understood the inability of man-  completely before greater productivity could result. He
                agement to increase individual productivity, and he  referred to his early experiences in seeking greater output
                understood the reluctance of workers to produce at a high  and described the strained feelings between himself and
                rate.                                            his workers as miserable.  Yet he was determined to
                   For more than twenty-five years, Taylor and his asso-  improve production. He continued his experiments until
                ciates explored ways to increase productivity. Scientific  three years before his death in 1915, when  he found that
                management has often been described as a series of tech-  human motivation, not just engineered improvement,
                niques for increasing production rates by means of better  could alone increase output.
                cost-accounting procedures, premium and incentive pay-  Unfortunately, the human factor was ignored by
                ments, and time and motion studies (which are designed  many. Shortly after the railroad hearings, self-proclaimed


                ENCYCLOPEDIA OF BUSINESS AND FINANCE, SECOND EDITION                                       655
   673   674   675   676   677   678   679   680   681   682   683