Page 280 - Academic Press Encyclopedia of Physical Science and Technology 3rd BioTechnology
P. 280

P1: GPB/GRB  P2: GLQ Final pages
 Encyclopedia of Physical Science and Technology  EN016J-783  August 1, 2001  10:58







              Tissue Engineering                                                                          831















                                   FIGURE 10 Definition of parameters that characterize single cell migration.

                It is important to note that these parameters are not de-  netic” or “haptokinetic” effect, the last term in Eq. (7)
              pendent on the geometry of the system used to measure  includes a correction for this effect.
              them and thus can be used to predict cell migration in other  The values of D and χ are the constitutive parameters
              geometries.Thismodelchieflyappliestotwo-dimensional  describing cell migration in a variety of both in vitro and
              surfaces; however, it can be extended to three-dimensional  in vivo systems. The expression analogous to Fick’s first
              matrices, in which case the effective pore size of the ma-  law of diffusion for cell flux is
              trix, which may create a hindrance to the migration pro-
                                                                               ∂C         dD      ∂L
              cess, needs to be taken into account. Cell migration in   J =−D      + C −      + χ          (8)
                                                                                ∂x       2dL       ∂x
              a specific direction can be promoted by micropatterning
              tracks on a surface, which prevents cells from wander-  and a cell concentration profile in any system can be de-
              ing away from the desired direction, and in three dimen-  rived via the continuity equation:
              sions by using materials exhibiting oriented pores and/or
                                                                                  ∂C     ∂ J
              fibers.                                                                 =−                    (9)
                The above discussion relates to the process of random             ∂t     ∂x
              migration where cells do not move in a preferential di-  In real cases, Eq. (9) may need to be solved in con-
              rection. It is often the case, however, that soluble and  junction with appropariate transport equations for the
              insoluble factors causing cells to move in a preferential  chemoattractant or haptotactic factor, which may be time
              direction are present. Soluble agents that “attract” cells  varying.
              are called chemotactic, while those immobilized in the  As briefly discussed earlier, cells migrating on sub-
              extracellular matrix are called haptotactic. In chemotactic  strates exert forces that allow them to move. As a result,
              or haptotactic migration, a third parameter must be deter-  cells on surfaces or inside gels that are compliant can
              mined to capture the directional preference of the migra-  significantly alter the shape of the material. Quantita-
              tion process. This parameter is the chemotactic index (CI),  tive analyses and mathematical descriptions of these
              which can be determined experimentally from single cell  phenomena allow prediction of how the cell-material con-
              trajectories by the equation:                     struct changes shape over time. A well-known example
                                                                of cell-mediated contraction is the fibroblast-populated
                                       d
                                CI =                     (6)    collagen lattice, which forms the basis for some of the
                                     L path
                                                                currently used tissue engineered skin grafts. The
              where  d	 is the distance of the cell from the point of origin  fibroblast-populated collagen lattice is generated by
              at the beginning of the experiment, and L path is the length  mixing fibroblasts with a chilled solution of collagen
              of the path used by the cell to achieve the displacement  d	.  in physiological buffer, followed by exposure to 37 C
                                                                                                           ◦
              The population-relevant parameter that describes chemo-  to induce the gellation of the collagen. If the gel is
              taxis is the chemotaxis coefficient χ, which is calculated  not anchored to any surface, fibroblasts embedded
              by the following expression:                      in a collagen gel cause the contraction of the gel in
                                                                an isotropic fashion. The contraction process can be


                           S · CI  1 dlnP    dlnS
                       χ =       −         −             (7)    controlled to a certain extent by mechanically restricting
                            ∇L     n   dL     dL
                                                                the motion along certain directions, which also induces a
              where L and ∇L are the concentration and spatial gradi-  preferential alignment of the collagen fibers as well as the
              ent, respectively, of chemoattractant or haptotactic factor.  cells within it, which results in a nonisotropic connective
              Because chemotactic and haptotactic factors may increase  tissue equivalent. Preferential alignment of cells may
              cell speed, and thus increase migration via a “chemoki-  be important in specific applications, such as in tissue
   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   283   284   285