Page 89 - Academic Press Encyclopedia of Physical Science and Technology 3rd BioTechnology
P. 89

P1: GRB Final Pages
 Encyclopedia of Physical Science and Technology  EN002G-67  May 25, 2001  20:8







              Bioreactors                                                                                 271

                When the substrate concentration S is much greater than  • METABOLIC ENGINEERING • PHOTOCHEMISTRY,MO-
              K m , Eqs. (12) and (13) reduce to the same form. In this  LECULAR • SEPARATION AND PURIFICATION OF BIO-
              case, the continuous flow stirred reactor and the plug flow  CHEMICALS
              device achieve similar conversion values in a given time.
              In contrast, when S   K m , the reaction rate becomes first
              order in the substrate concentration (see Eq. (9)), and the  BIBLIOGRAPHY
              plug flow reactor provides higher conversion values in
              comparison with the well-mixed continuous flow device.  Atkinson, B. (1974). “Biological Reactors,” Pion Press, London.
              In the latter bioreactor, all the enzyme would be exposed  Bailey, J. E., and Ollis, D. F. (1986). “Biochemical Engineering Funda-
              to the same low concentration of the substrate which is  mentals,” 2nd Ed., McGraw-Hill, New York.
                                                                Chisti, Y. (1989). “Airlift Bioreactors,” Elsevier, London.
              not useful except when the reaction is inhibited by the
                                                                Chisti,Y.(1999).Solidsubstratefermentations,enzymeproduction,food
              substrate.                                         enrichment. In “Encyclopedia of Bioprocess Technology: Fermenta-
                                                                 tion, Biocatalysis, and Bioseparation,” (M. C. Flickinger and S. W.
                                                                 Drew, eds.), Vol. 5, pp. 2446–2462, Wiley, New York.
              IV. CONCLUDING REMARKS                            Chisti, Y. (1999). Modern systems of plant cleaning. In “Encyclopedia
                                                                 of Food Microbiology” (R. Robinson, C. Batt, and P. Patel, eds.), pp.
                                                                 1806–1815, Academic Press, London.
              A bioreactor is an indispensable part of any bioprocess
                                                                Chisti, Y., and Moo-Young, M. (1999). Fermentation technology, biopro-
              irrespective of whether the process degrades pollutants  cessing, scale-up and manufacture. In “Biotechnology: The Science
              or produces substances such as foods, feeds, chemicals  and the Business” (V. Moses, R. E. Cape, and D. G. Springham, eds.),
              and pharmaceuticals, and tissues and organs for use in  2nd ed., pp. 177–222, Harwood Academic Publishers, New York.
              biomedicine. The variety of bioprocesses is tremendous  Deckwer, W. D. (1992). “Bubble Column Reactors,” Wiley, New York.
                                                                Doran, P. M. (1999). “Design of mixing systems for plant cell suspen-
              and many different designs of bioreactors have been devel-
                                                                 sions in stirred reactors,” Biotechnol. Prog. 15, 319–335.
              oped to meet the different needs. In all cases, the bioreac-  Moser, A. (1981). “Bioprocess Technology,” Springer-Verlag, New
              tor must provide the environmental conditions necessary  York.
              for the culture. The specific demands are often conflict-  Nienow, A. W. (1998). “Hydrodynamics of stirred bioreactors,” Appl.
              ing and achieving optimal performance requires attaining  Mech. Rev. 51, 3–32.
                                                                Tredici, M. R. (1999). Bioreactors, photo. In “Encyclopedia of Biopro-
              the proper balance among the different requirements. Suc-
                                                                 cess Technology: Fermentation, Biocatalysis, and Bioseparation” (M.
              cess of a bioprocess depends critically on good design and  C. Flickinger and S. W. Drew, eds.), Vol. 1, pp. 395–419, Wiley, New
              operation of the bioreactor.                       York.
                                                                Van’t Riet, K., and Tramper, J. (1991). “Basic Bioreactor Design,”
                                                                 Dekker, New York.
              SEE ALSO THE FOLLOWING ARTICLES                   Varley, J., and Birch, J. (1999). “Reactor design for large scale suspension
                                                                 animal cell culture,” Cytotechnology 29, 177–205.
                                                                Willaert, R. G., Baron, G. V., and De Backer, L. (eds.) (1996). “Immo-
              BIOENERGETICS • BIOMASS,BIOENGINEERING OF •        bilised Living Cell Systems: Modelling and Experimental Methods,”
              ENZYME MECHANISMS • MAMMALIAN CELL CULTURE         Wiley, Chichester.
   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94