Page 31 - Academic Press Encyclopedia of Physical Science and Technology 3rd Chemical Engineering
P. 31

P1: FJD Revised Pages
 Encyclopedia of Physical Science and Technology  EN001-13  May 7, 2001  12:29







              Adsorption (Chemical Engineering)                                                           253

              escalation of energy prices during the 1970s. The tradi-  A diameter of 20 A represents approximately the limit-
                                                                               ˚
              tional method of bulk separation is distillation, and al-  ing pore size that can be measured by mercury intrusion.
              though distillation has the advantages of wide applicabil-  In pores smaller than this, transport becomes increasingly
              ity and proven technology, it suffers from the disadvantage  affected by molecule–pore wall interactions, and conven-
              of very poor energy efficiency, particularly when the dif-  tional theories based on molecular and Knudsen diffusion
              ference in volatility of the components to be separated is  breakdown.Theclassificationissomewhatarbitrary,how-
              small. With increasing energy costs the balance of eco-  ever, since the point at which such effects become impor-
              nomic advantage for such separations has shifted toward  tant also depends on the size of the diffusing molecule.
              alternative technologies, such as adsorption, that gener-  Adsorption equilibrium in microporous adsorbents also
              ally involve a higher capital outlay but offer the advantage  depends to some extent on the pore size as well as on the
              of greater energy efficiency and therefore lower operating  nature of the surface, so control of the pore size distribu-
              costs. Examples of large-scale bulk separation processes  tion is important in the manufacture of an adsorbent for a
              that are commonly accomplished by adsorption include  particular separation.
              the separation of xylene isomers (liquid phase), the sepa-  Activated carbon is by far the most widely used ad-
              ration of linear and branched paraffins (gas phase or liq-  sorbent. It is available in a wide range of different forms
              uid phase), and the separation of olefins from paraffins  that differ mainly in pore size and pore size distribution.
              (gas phase or liquid phase). Similar adsorption separation  The carbon surface is essentially nonpolar although some
              processes have also been developed for a number of im-  polarity can be imparted by surface oxidation or other
              portant carbohydrate separations (e.g., fructose–glucose)  pre-treatments. It is widely used for removal of low con-
              that cannot easily be accomplished by more traditional  centrations of organics, either from aqueous streams (for
              methods.                                          example, decolorization of sugar or water treatment) or
                The primary requirement for an economic adsorption  from vapor streams (for example, in range hoods and other
              separation process is an adsorbent with sufficient selec-  pollution-control devices). Crystalline silica adsorbents
              tivity, capacity, and life. Adsorption selectivity may de-  such as silicalite are also organophilic but are substantially
              pend either on a difference in adsorption equilibrium or,  more expensive than activated carbon so their application
              less commonly, on a difference in kinetics. Kinetic selec-  is generally limited to situations where, for some reason,
              tivity is generally possible only with microporous adsor-  the use of carbon is not appropriate.
              bents such as zeolites or carbon molecular sieves. One  In “molecular sieve” adsorbents, such as zeolites and
              can consider processes such as the separation of linear  carbon molecular sieves, the micropore size distribution
              from branched hydrocarbons on a 5A zeolite sieve to be  is extremely narrow, thus allowing the possibility of ki-
              an extreme example of a kinetic separation. The critical  netic separations based on differences in molecular size.
              molecular diameter of a branched or cyclic hydrocarbon  However, this feature is utilized in only a few commer-
              is too large to allow penetration of the 5A zeolite crystal,  cial adsorption separation processes, and in the majority
              whereas the linear species are just small enough to en-  of such processes the separation depends on differences
              ter. The ratio of intracrystalline diffusivities is therefore  in the adsorption equilibrium rather than on the kinetics,
              effectively infinite, and a very clean separation is possible.  even though a “molecular sieve” adsorbent may be used.
                                                                  The Al-rich (cationic) zeolites have highly polar inter-
                                                                nal surfaces. The polarity increases with increasing cation
              III. MICROPOROUS ADSORBENTS                       charge and decreasing cation size. However, the relation-
                                                                ship between the nature of the cation and the surface prop-
              Since adsorption is essentially a surface phenomenon, a  erties is complex because the differences in cation location
              practical adsorbent must have a high specific surface area,  (sites) must also be considered.
              which means small diameter pores. Conventional adsor-  The commercially available zeolite adsorbents consist
              bents such as porous alumina, silica gel, and activated  of small microporous zeolite crystals, aggregated with the
              carbon have relatively wide pore size distributions, span-  aid of a clay binder. The pore size distribution thus has a
              ning the entire range from a few angstroms to perhaps  well-defined bimodal character, with the diameter of the
              1 µm. For convenience the pores are sometimes divided  intracrystalline micropores being determined by the crys-
              into three classes:                               tal structure and the macropore size being determined by
                                                                the crystal diameter and the method of pelletization. As
                        Micropores:   <20 ˚ A diameter          originally defined, the term zeolite was restricted to alu-
                        Mesopores:  20–500 ˚ A diameter         minosilicate structures, which can be regarded as assem-
                        Macropores:  >500 ˚ A diameter          blages of SiO 2 and AlO 2 tetrahedra. However, essentially
   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36