Page 312 - Academic Press Encyclopedia of Physical Science and Technology 3rd Organic Chemistry
P. 312

P1: GRB Final Pages
 Encyclopedia of Physical Science and Technology  EN016B-738  July 31, 2001  14:0







              Stereochemistry                                                                              93

              called “heterotopic” (from Greek “heteros,” different, and  THEORY • ORGANIC CHEMISTRY,SYNTHESIS • PHYSICAL
              “topos,” place). In contrast, the carbon atom in CH 3 Cl is  ORGANIC CHEMISTRY • PROTEIN STRUCTURE • PROTEIN
              not prochiral since replacement of H by, say, D would  SYNTHESIS • RHEOLOGY OF POLYMERIC LIQUIDS
              produce CH 2 DCl, which remains achiral.
                In the former case (CH 2 ClBr) replacement of one or
              other of the two hydrogen atoms gives rise to enantiomeric  BIBLIOGRAPHY
              products. The hydrogen atoms are therefore called “enan-
              tiotopic.” In the latter case, replacement gives the same
                                                                Addadi, L., Berkovitch-Yellin, Z., Weissbuch, I., Lahav, M., and
              compound and the hydrogens in CH 3 Cl are called “ho-  Leiserowitz, L. (1986). “A link between macroscopic phenomena and
              motopic.” In a molecule such as CH 2 BrCHOHCO 2 H,  molecular chirality: Crystals as probes for the direct assignment of
              replacement of one of the terminal hydrogens by, say,  absolute configuration of chiral molecules. In “Topics in Stereochem-
              chlorine would give one or other of the diastereomers of  istry,” Vol. 16, pp. 1–85, Wiley, New York.
                                                                Cahn, R. S., Ingold, C., and Prelog, V. (1966). “Specification of molec-
              CHBrClCHOHCO 2 H; in this case the terminal hydrogens
                                                                 ular chirality,” Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 5, 385–415 .
              are said to be diastereotopic. These definitions of homo-  Eliel, E. L. (1982). “Prostereoisomerism (prochirality).”In “Top-
              topic, enantiotopic, and diastereotopic ligands also pro-  ics in Current Chemistry,” Vol. 105, pp. 1–76, Springer-Verlag,
              vide a means for their recognition: Replacement of one  Heidelberg.
              of two or more homotopic ligands by a different ligand  Eliel, E. L., and Wilen, S. H. (1994). “Stereochemistry of Organic Com-
                                                                 pounds,” Wiley, New York.
              gives identical products, analogous replacement of enan-
                                                                Eliel, E. L., Allinger, N. L., Angyal, S. J., and Morrison, G. A. (1965).
              tiotopic ligands gives enantiomeric products, and such re-  “Conformational Analysis,” Wiley, New York [reprinted (1981),
              placement of diastereotopic ligands gives diastereomeric  American Chemical Society, Washington, DC.]
              products. There is also a symmetry criterion which may  Fasman, G. D. (ed.). (1996). “Circular Dichroism and the Conforma-
                                                                 tional Analysis of Biomolecules,” Plenum Press, New York.
              be applied to the appropriate molecules above: Homotopic
                                                                Gawley, R. E., and Aub´e, J. (1996). “Principles of Asymmetric Synthe-
              ligandsinamoleculeareinterchangedbyoperationofboth
                                                                 sis,” Pergamon Press, Oxford.
              simple symmetry axes and symmetry planes; enantiotopic  Hegstrom, R. A., and Kondepudi, D. K. (1990). “The handedness of the
              ligands are interchanged by operation of a symmetry plane  universe,” Sci. Am. 262(January), 108–115.
              but not by operation of a simple symmetry axis, and di-  Jacques, J., Collet, A., and Wilen, S. H. (1981). “Enantiomers, Race-
              astereotopic ligands are interchanged neither by symmetry  mates and Resolutions,” Wiley, New York.
                                                                Juaristi, E. (ed.). (1995). “Conformational Behavior of Six-Membered
              axes nor by symmetry planes.
                                                                 Rings,” VCH, New York.
                Diastereotopic ligands (e.g., protons or C-13 atoms)  Kagan, H. B., and Fiaud, J. C. (1988). “Kinetic resolution.” In “Topics
              generally display distinct signals in NMR spectra, but ho-  in Stereochemistry,” Vol. 18, pp. 249–330, Wiley, New York.
              motopic and enantiotopic ligands have coincident (iden-  Klyne, W., and Prelog, V. (1960). “Description of stereochemical rela-
              tical) signals (except possibly in the case of enantiotopic  tionships across single bonds,” Experientia 16, 521–523.
                                                                Kondru, R. K., Wipf, P., and Beratan, D. N. (1998). “Atomic contribu-
              ligands, in a chiral solvent, or in the presence of a chi-
                                                                 tions to the optical rotation angle as a quantitative probe of molecular
              ral complexing agent) since NMR is an achiral technique.  chirality,” Science 282, 2247–2250; id. (1998). Theory-assisted de-
              Both enantiotopic and diastereotopic ligands may be dis-  termination of absolute stereochemistry for complex natural products
              tinguished by enzymes (which are chiral). Thus in citric  vid computation of molecular rotation angle, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 120,
              acid,HO 2 CCH 2 C(OH)(CO 2 H)CH 2 CO 2 H,allfourmethy-  2204–2205.
                                                                Mislow, K., and Raban, M. (1967). “Stereoisomeric relationships of
              lene hydrogen atoms are distinguished by enzymes in the
                                                                 groups in molecules.” In “Topics in Stereochemistry,” Vol. 1, pp. 1–
              citric acid cycle (to demonstrate this distinction, they must  38, Wiley, New York.
              be individually labeled as deuterium atoms). On the other  Nakanishi, K., Berova, N., and Woody, R. W. (eds.). (2000). “Cir-
              hand, the CH 2 groups are pairwise identical in NMR (e.g.,  cular Dichroism: Principles and applications,” Wiley-VCH, New
                                                                 York.
              C-13) but the geminal hydrogen atoms in each are di-
                                                                Pauling, L., Corey, R. B., and Branson, H. R. (1951). “The structure of
              astereotopic and provide an (AB) 2 system in the proton
                                                                 proteins: Two hydrogen bonded helical configurations of the polypep-
              NMR  spectrum.  Further  details  may  be  found  in  Eliel  tide chain,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 37, 205–211.
              (1982) and Eliel and Wilen (1994).                Prelog, V., and Helmchen, G. (1982). “Basic principles of the CIP system
                                                                 and proposals for a revision,” Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 21, 567–
              SEE ALSO THE FOLLOWING ARTICLES                    583.
                                                                Ramsay, O. B. (1981). “Stereochemistry,” Heyden & Son, Philadelphia.
                                                                Sih, C. J., and Wu, S.-H. (1989). “Resolution of enantiomers via bio-
              BIOPOLYMERS • ENZYME MECHANISMS • NUCLEAR          catalysis.” In “Topics in Stereochemistry,” Vol. 19, pp. 63–125, Wiley,
              MAGNETIC RESONANCE • ORGANIC CHEMICAL SYSTEMS,     New York.
   307   308   309   310   311   312