Page 311 - Academic Press Encyclopedia of Physical Science and Technology 3rd Organic Chemistry
P. 311

P1: GRB Final Pages
 Encyclopedia of Physical Science and Technology  EN016B-738  July 31, 2001  14:0






               92                                                                                     Stereochemistry


               including NMR in a chiral solvent or with a chiral com-  been superseded by the simpler to interpret CD (Nakanishi
               plexing agent, or by chromatography of unmodified enan-  et al., 2000). While it might appear that plane-polarized
               tiomers on a chiral stationary phase. The methods just  light is achiral, it may actually be considered to be a su-
               described provide the mole fractions of each individual  perposition of right- and left-circularly polarized light in
               enantiomer, which may be expressed as an enantiomer  which the sense of polarization changes as a right-handed
               ratio (n + /n − or n − /n + ). However, because optical pu-  or left-handed helix along the direction of propagation of
               rity had been used in the past, it is more common to  the light beam. If the right- and left-circularly polarized
               use an expression for “enantiomeric excess” (e.e.): e.e. =  beams proceed at the same speed, the result is light polar-
               |(n + − n − )|/(n + + n − ). Since this represents the mole  ized in an unchanging plane, but if one of the two generat-
               fraction of the major enantiomer diminished by that of the  ing beams moves faster than the other, the plane of polar-
               minor one, it is equal to the above-defined optical purity.  ization will keep turning as the light propagates, i.e., there
                 Although there is no direct relation between sign of  will be optical rotation. Since the speed of light depends
               rotation and configuration, it may now become possible  on the refractive index of the medium it traverses, the
               to infer configuration from optical rotation data (Kondra,  polarization is thus caused by unequal refractive indices
               Wipf, and Beratan, 1998). The method is based on van’t  for right- and left-circularly polarized light. There are de-
               Hoff’s “optical superposition” rule, which says that in a  vices that can produce right- and left-circularly polarized
               molecule containing several chiral centers, the total molar  light beams separate from each other. Using such beams,
               rotation (	 = 100α/MW) is the sum of the contributions  it is found that not only the refractive indices, but also
               of each chiral center. As originally proposed the rule had  the absorption coefficients for the two beams differ. The
               several shortcomings, including (1) that it would require  phenomenon resulting from this difference in absorption
               model compounds of known absolute configuration to de-  is called “circular dichroism” and manifests itself in what
               termine the contribution of a given chiral center and (2)  looks similar to an absorption curve in the UV, except that
               it does not hold when the centers are close to each other  it is signed. (In fact its maximum or minimum occurs at
               and thus influence each other’s contributions. This second  the wavelength of the UV maximum.) Comparison of CD
               limitation means that for closely connected chiral centers,  absorption spectra can be used to infer configuration sim-
               it is necessary to determine the contribution of a segment  ilarly as was the case for ORD; however, CD spectra are
               containing all of these centers. The first problem is being  better resolved than ORD spectra since there is less band
               attacked by performing a priori computations of the mo-  overlap resulting from multiple UV absorption maxima.
               lar rotation contribution of individual chiral centers or ap-  CD is also very useful in throwing light on confor-
               propriate groupings thereof (Kondra, Wipf, and Beratan,  mation. Thus the (weak) CD absorption spectrum of a
               1998). This is becoming possible due to the advances in  random-coil polypeptide chain is essentially a superposi-
               quantum chemical calculations (e.g., by density functional  tion of the spectra of the individual constituting amino
               methods) and the increasing power of computers to handle  acids. However, when secondary structure comes into
               computationally demanding problems.               play, as in an α helix of β-pleated sheet, a large and char-
                 Other chiroptical techniques to infer configuration are  acteristic increase in CD absorption is observed, which, in
               optical rotatory dispersion (ORD) and circular dichroism  turn, allows one to infer the nature of the secondary struc-
               (CD). ORD relates to the change in optical rotation with  ture, if any. CD is used to infer not only protein but also
               the wavelength of the light employed in the measure-  nucleic acid and polysaccharide conformation (Fasman,
               ment. Normally the absolute value of rotation increases  1996).
               as wavelength becomes shorter; observation at shorter
               wavelengths is thus a convenient way to increase rota-  XIV. PROCHIRALITY
               tion (and thereby the accuracy of measuring it) when α D
               is small. However, as the wavelength approaches that of a  The  phenomenon  of  prochirality  (Mislow  and  Raban,
               UV absorption band (e.g., of C O in a ketone), its abso-  1967)  is  important  both  in  NMR  spectroscopy  and  in
               lute value (whether positive or negative) suddenly drops  enzyme chemistry. An atomic center (e.g., a tetrahedral
               precipitously, passes through zero near the UV absorp-  carbon atom) in a molecule is considered “prochiral” if
               tion maximum, reverses sign rapidly approaching another  replacing one of two identical ligands at the center by a
               extremum (of opposite sign to the first), and then gradu-  different one not previously attached to that center pro-
               ally declines. This phenomenon of rapid change at the UV  duces a chiral center. Thus the carbon atom in CH 2 ClBr
               maximumiscalledthe“Cottoneffect”aftertheFrenchsci-  is prochiral since hypothetical replacement of one of the
               entist who discovered it. Similarity in Cotton effects of re-  hydrogen atoms by deuterium yields CHDClBr, which
               lated compounds, one of known and one of unknown con-  is chiral. The apparently identical (or “homomorphous,”
               figuration, can sometimes be used to assign the configura-  from Greek “homos,” same, and “morphe,” form) hy-
               tion of the unknown. However the use of ORD has largely  drogen atoms in CH 2 ClBr are in fact distinct; they are
   306   307   308   309   310   311   312