Page 240 - Academic Press Encyclopedia of Physical Science and Technology 3rd Analytical Chemistry
P. 240

P1: GRB/GWT  P2: GPJ/GAX  QC: GAE/FYD Final Pages
 Encyclopedia of Physical Science and Technology  EN008M-395  June 29, 2001  15:52







              Magnetic Resonance in Medicine                                                              965

              D. Comparison to Other Forms of Magnetism         Furthermore, unlike ferromagnetism, nuclear magnetism
                                                                is present only when an external field is applied.
              As already mentioned, individual atoms can create mag-
              netic fields by three general mechanisms: the orbital mo-
              tion of their electrons and the spin motions of their elec-  E. Bloch Equations
              trons and nuclei. In most cases, for any large collection
                                                                The magnetic energy associated with the spin of an indi-
              of atoms, there is a very strong cancellation of magnetic
                                                                vidual nucleus is far too weak to produce detectable effect
              properties so that on a macroscopic scale most materials
                                                                under any circumstances. In practice, we are always con-
              appear to be nonmagnetic. The most important exceptions
                                                                cerned with the signals arising from the additive effects of
              are the ferromagnetic materials, of which iron is the most                         3
                                                                enormous numbers of nuclei (e.g., 1 mm of water con-
              familiar. In this case, internal quantum effects force many   19
                                                                tains 6.62 × 10  protons). It is desirable, therefore, to
              of the electron spins to be in alignment with one another,
                                                                turn from the properties of individual nuclei governed by
              and an intense and easily observable spontaneous magne-
                                                                quantum mechanics to the behavior in space and time of
              tization results, even when no external field is applied.
                                                                a statistically averaged quantity (i.e., M), the bulk nuclear
                Nonferromagnetic materials, such as human tissues,
                                                                magnetization. Strictly speaking we should use a more
              have no net magnetization until placed in an external mag-
                                                                qualified notation, such as M n , to indicate that we are now
              netic field and even then the resultant magnetization is so
                                                                concerned only with the nuclear component of the magne-
              weak that it cannot be detected except by use of very sen-
                                                                tization. Instead, however, we will follow convention, use
              sitive equipment. Alignment processes, which cause M to
                                                                M,andassumethattherestrictionisclearfromthecontext.
              oppose the applied field, give negative contributions to the
                                                                Once the statistical averaging is carried out, the peculiari-
              susceptibility and are called diamagnetic. Processes with
                                                                ties associated with the quantum behavior of the individual
              the opposite behavior are called paramagnetic. Generally
                                                                nuclei are no longer evident. For example, unlike the mag-
              speaking, diamagnetism results from a field-induced al-
                                                                netic moment of a single nucleus, the component of the
              teration of the electron orbits. This produces an induced
                                                                magnetization in a given direction can take on a continu-
              field that tends to oppose the applied field. Paramagnetism
                                                                ous range of values without restrictions. It is found that the
              results from the tendency of spinning particles (electrons
                                                                nuclear magnetization can exhibit an elaborate behavior
              or nuclei) to align with the applied field. The electron spin
                                                                as a function of time that is driven by two factors. First,
              paramagnetism tends to be small or absent because in most
                                                                there are the externally applied fields that act on all of the
              materials these electron spins tend to cancel in pairs. The
                                                                nuclei equally and simultaneously to produce a gyroscopic
              orbital motion of the electrons in the H 2 O molecule give  motion of the magnetization vector. Second, there is the
                                                         −6
              bulk water a diamagnetic susceptibility of −9.05 × 10 .
                                                                effect of all the internal magnetic fields that are derived
              From Eq. (3) the paramagnetic nuclear susceptibility of
                                                                from the electrons and other nuclei in the vicinity of each
              the protons in water at body temperature was calculated  individual nucleus to produce relaxation processes. These
                       −9
              as 3.86 × 10 . The total magnetic susceptibility of water
                                                                relaxation processes continually drive the magnetization
              is the sum of these two values. Even though water has
                                                                toward its equilibrium value. The effects of the externally
              one of the highest nuclear magnetic susceptibilities due
                                                                applied fields, considered for a moment to be acting alone,
              to the large magnetic moment of the proton and the large
                                                                are to provide a torque acting on the magnetization such
              number of protons in a sample of water, the nuclear para-
                                                                that
              magnetism of water is completed swamped by the orbital
                                                                               dM
              diamagnetism of the electrons even though that itself is a           = γ (M × B).            (4)
              very weak effect.                                                 dt
                It is useful to compare the relative strengths of the  This equation does not yet include the effects of the
              various forms of magnetism. The spontaneous magne-  interaction of the spins with their internal surroundings,
                                         6
              tization of iron is about 1.7 × 10 A/m. In a rather in-  the “lattice.” However, it contains many of the physical
              tense applied field of 1 T, the bulk magnetization of water  concepts that explain how the nuclear magnetization can
              would be −7.0 A/m due to the orbital diamagnetism and  be detected despite its weak strength. Equation (4) will
              3.1 × 10 −3  A/m due to the nuclei. These comparative fig-  describe the evolution of M for short times (i.e., for times
              ures explain why it is not possible to detect nuclear mag-  much shorter than T 1 and T 2 described in the following).
              netization by direct effects such as the orientation of iron  In human imaging studies this means that Eq. (4) by itself
              filings or the deflection of a compass needle, even though  is enough to describe processes that require a few mil-
              these effects can be easily demonstrated with ferromag-  liseconds or less to complete. This includes the Larmor
              netic materials. The nuclear magnetization is too weak,  precession, which completes each cycle in a fraction of
              by several orders of magnitude, to produce these effects.  a microsecond. It also includes the B 1 excitation pulses,
   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245