Page 100 - Academic Press Encyclopedia of Physical Science and Technology 3rd Polymer
P. 100

P1: GOX/LBD  P2: GLQ Final Pages
 Encyclopedia of Physical Science and Technology  EN012K-587  July 26, 2001  10:35






               470                                                                                  Plastics Engineering


               TABLE IV  Typical Prices of Engineering Plastics (Relative  (plastics, metals, ceramics, etc.) to obtain a ranking of the
               to Polypropylene)                                 cost effectiveness of each. If it is desired to make the com-
                                Density    Price      Price      parison on the basis of maximum stiffness for minimum
                                    3
                   Material     (kg/m )  (vol. basis)  (wt. basis)  weight, the bottom line of the equation should be simply
                                                                 ρ instead of ρC.
               Polypropylene      905        1          1
                                                                   A similar analysis can be carried out for a range of other
               ABC               1040        2.6        2.3
                                                                 structural shapes. The relevant equations are summarized
               Polyacetal        1410        5.7        3.7
                                                                 in Table V.
               Polyamide(66)     1140        5.7        4.5
               Polyamide(66)/30%g  1300      6.3        4.4
               Polyamide-imide   1380       82.8       54.3
                                                                 IV. SUCCESSFUL ENGINEERING
               Polycarbonate     1240        5.5        4
                                                                     APPLICATIONS FOR PLASTICS
               Polyetherimide    1270       13.8        9.8
               Polyethersulfone  1370       19.3       12.7
                                                                 There are many success stories where the use of plastics
               Polysulfone       1240       13.8       10.1
                                                                 and composites has resulted in improved performance and
               Polysulfone 30%g  1450       13.4        8.4
                                                                 new markets for products that had previously been manu-
               Polyimide         1400      160        103.4
                                                                 factured from more traditional materials. Some examples
               Mod. PPO          1100        3.4        2.8
                                                                 of these applications are as follows.
               Mod. PPO/30%g     1270        6.8        4.8
               Polyester(PET)    1360        5.4        3.6
               PET/30%glass      1680        6.2        3.3      A. Automotive Applications
               Polyph. sulf(PPS)  1350      15.2       10.2
                                                                 It has been evident for many years that the plastics industry
               PPS/30%glass      1650       12.4        6.8
                                                                 views the automotive sector as one of its most demanding
               PEEK              1320       75.9       52
                                                                 challenges, both in terms of materials performance, qual-
               PEEK/30%C         1420       82.8       52.8
                                                                 ity, and the production rates required. Initially the vast ma-
               Liquid crystal    1600       69         39
                                                                 jority of uses of plastics were in vehicle trim (that is, sec-
               Fluoropol. (ECTFE)  1580     42.9       24.6
                                                                 ondary, non-loadbearing applications). In 1960 a typical
               Allyls            1820       9.7         4.8
                                                                 family car contained about 1% by weight of plastic. Today
               Allyls/glass      2000       11.7        5.3
                                                                 the average weight of plastic in a car is about 175 kg, rep-
               Aminos (urea)     1500        2.6        1.6
                                                                 resenting between 9 and 18% of the weight of the vehicle.
               Aminos (melamine)  1500       2.9        1.7
                                                                   Interior trim still accounts for the biggest proportion of
               Cyanates          1250       63.4       45.9
                                                                 plastics in cars (about 40% of the total) but the use of plas-
               Epoxies           1300        4.8        3.3
                                                                 tics in demanding under-the-hood applications is increas-
               Phenolics         1400        2.1        1.4
                                                                 ing rapidly and is expected to reach 20% soon. At present
               Unsat. polyesters  1300       2.3        1.6
                                                                 more than 25% of the air inlet units made for cars world
                                                                 wide are plastic. Cost savings of over 50% are quoted in
                                                                 regard to this conversion from metal to plastic, accompa-
                              Stiffness = α 2  Ed 3       (2)    nied by similar benefits in weight reduction. Exterior body
                                                                 panels also represent an exciting challenge for plastics in
               where α 2  is a constant.                         terms of design for manufacture and performance. Sheet
                 Now the cost of the beam will be given by:      molding compound (SMC) is a composite that is popu-
                                                                 lar in this sector, and at the current time approximately
                                Cost = α 3  ρdC           (3)
                                                                 13 million units are manufactured annually for automo-
               where ρ is density, C is cost per unit weight, and α 3  is a  tive use. Body panels from other materials such as PET or
               constant.                                         polypropylene blends reinforced with glass fibers and al-
                 So substituting from Eq. (2) into Eq. (3) for the depth  loys of polycarbonate/polybutylene terephthalate are also
               d,                                                proving to be very successful. A primary target in this ap-
                                                                 plication is to achieve a Class A, durable finish straight
                                           1/3
                              Cost = α 4 (ρC/E  )         (4)
                                                                 from the mold so as to remove the need for the relatively
                 Hence,  the  desirability  factor  in  the  material,  in  or-  expensive painting stage.
               der to minimize cost for the given stiffness, is the ratio  Polypropylene continues to be the popular choice for
               (E 1/3  /ρC), which should be maximized. Using this re-  automotive applications. U.S. consumption of this mate-
               lationship it is possible to compare a range of materials  rial for cars is currently about a billion pounds. Many
   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105