Page 312 - Academic Press Encyclopedia of Physical Science and Technology 3rd Polymer
P. 312

P1: GQT/MBQ  P2: GPJ Final Pages
 Encyclopedia of Physical Science and Technology  EN014C-660  July 28, 2001  17:14






               250                                                                            Rheology of Polymeric Liquids




























                      FIGURE 18 Plots of log G versus log a T ω (open symbols) and plots of log G versus log a T ω (filled symbols) for a


                                         r                                   r
                                                                                                ◦
                      nearly monodisperse polystyrene with molecular weight of 1.95 × 105 at various temperatures ( ,  ) 160 C, ( ,  )
                                                                                ◦
                      170 C, ( ,  ) 180 C, ( ,  ) 200 C, ( ,  ) 210 C, ( , ) 220 C, and (  ,  ) 230 C.
                                                                 ◦
                                   ◦
                         ◦
                                             ◦
                                                       ◦
                 The tube model yields the following expressions for  We therefore have the following relationships:
               the linear viscoelastic properties of concentrated polymer       3          3   0     0
                                                                          τ d ∝ M ;  η 0 ∝ M ;  J ∝ M .     (73)
               solutions or polymer melts:                                                     e
                                                                 On the other hand, it is well established experimentally
                                2     0
                         η 0 = (π /12)G τ d ,            (67)              3.4
                                      N                          that η 0 ∝ M  for entangled polymer melts (see Eq. (44)).
                          0       0
                         J = 6/5G ,                      (68)    Thus the prediction of the tube model deviates from the
                          e       N
                                                                 well-established relationship between η 0 and M for en-
                                                   2
                                   ∞

                              8G  0 
  1    ωτ d p 2             tangled polymer melts.
                                N
                      G (ω) =   2      2             ,   (69)
                                                    2
                               π      p            2               While the Rouse model considers only intramolecular
                                  odd p  1 + ωτ d p
                                                                 motions, the tube model deals with intermolecular inter-
                              8G  0 
  1     ωτ d                actions due to entanglement couplings and neglects in-
                                   ∞
                                N
                      G (ω) =                        ,   (70)
                                                    2
                               π 2    p 2  1 + ωτ d p 2          tramolecular motions. The neglecting of intramolecular


                                  odd p
                                                                 motions that may occur on the time scale shorter than the
               where τ d is the disengagement time defined by     time scale of reptation motions was thought to be respon-
                                                                 sible for the 3.0 power dependence of η 0 on M, given in
                                  3 4
                               ζ N b       K     3


                          τ d =        =       M ,       (71)    Eq. (72). Doi incorporated fluctuations of contour length
                                2 2
                              π a k B T   M e
                                                                 into the tube model and obtained the following expression
               in which K is given by Eq. (56). Thus η 0 given by Eq. (67)  for η 0 :
               can be rewritten as                                       2           3
                                                                        π KρRT     M

                                                                                       
              0.5 3
                                         2                        η 0 =                 1 − 1.47(M e /M)  . (74)
                               0.10416 ρb ζ 0 N A  3                       15      M 2
                                         0
                         η 0 =          2      M .       (72)                        e
                                      2
                                    M M 0
                                      e
                                                                 It can be shown that values of η 0 predicted from Eq. (74)
                                                                 are numerically close to the 3.4 power of molecular weight
                                                                  M for 20M e < M < 200M e .
                                                                   By combining the molecular network theory and the
                                                                 tube model, the following expression for η 0 predicting a
                                                                 gradualtransitionfrom3.5powerto3.0powerdependence
                                                                 of η 0 on M as M/M e ratio increases is reported:
                                                                                               2
                                                                                 0.001496 ρN A ζ 0 b  3.5
                                                                           η 0 =                 M   .      (75)
                    FIGURE 19 Schematic describing the tube model.                   M 2.5 M 2
                                                                                       e   0
   307   308   309   310   311   312   313   314   315   316   317