Page 275 - Academic Press Encyclopedia of Physical Science and Technology 3rd InOrganic Chemistry
P. 275

P1: GNH Final Pages
 Encyclopedia of Physical Science and Technology  EN009M-428  July 18, 2001  1:6






               532                                                                       Metal Particles and Cluster Compounds


               short distance is that for the Cr Cr quadruple bond in  by a rotation about the metal–metal bond without a serious
               Li 6 [Cr 2 (σ-C 6 H 4 O) 4 ]Br 2 .  From  the  spectroscopic  data  loss in δ bonding.
               of  bare  Cr Cr  dimers,  studied  under  matrix  isolation  One further tool for establishing the presence and order
                                                        ˚
               condition, an even shorter Cr Cr distance of 1.71 A has  of metal–metal bonds is theoretical analysis. Such analysis
                                                   10 2
               been inferred. This nonligated dimer has a d s electron  has provided results which are consistent with the simple d
               configuration, hence, a sextuple bond has been postulated.  orbital-d-orbital mixing ideas which lead to the one σ two
               The remarkably short Cr Cr distance seems congruent  π, and one δ bond. The energy of the bonding orbitals is
               with  a  sextuple  bond.  The  Mo Mo  single  bond  in  inversely proportional to the degree of atomic orbital over-
               (C 5 H 5 )(CO) 3  Mo Mo(CO) 3 (C 5 H 5 ) has a bond distance  lap, the opposite being true for the antibonding orbitals.
                      ˚
               of 3.21 A and is the longest distance between two metal  The energy ordering scheme up through the σ  antibond-
               atoms which are considered to have a formal metal–metal  ing orbital is shown in Fig. 14. Since metal–metal bonding
               bond. In general, if two metal atoms which are not bridged  essentially occurs through the d-orbitals, the d orbital oc-
                                        ˚
               byanyligandscomewithin3.2 Aofeachothertheymaybe   cupancy, or the oxidation state of the metals, necessarily
               considered to have a metal–metal bond. The restriction of  dictates the upper limit of the bond order which may be
               this generalization to nonbridged metal atoms is important  obtained. Filling the orbitals of the energy diagram clearly
                                                                                                 4
                                                                                              4
               as bridges may have a considerable effect on the metal–  shows that the eight electrons of a d –d system, such as
                                                                        2−
               metal distance. The specific effect that a bridging ligand  [Re 2 Cl 8 ]  can produce a metal–metal quadruple bond.
               will have on a metal–metal bond depends on what ligand is  The isoelectronic Mo(II)–Mo(II) compound [Mo 2 Cl 8 ] 4−
               acting as the bridge. Bridging hydride ligands, for exam-  has  also  been  structurally  characterized.  The  Mo Mo
                                                                                                        ˚
                                                                                             ˚
               ple, are generally associated with metal–metal bonds that  quadruple bond distance of 2.138 A is about 0.1 A shorter
               are longer than similar nonbridged bonds. Carbonyl lig-  than that of the Re Re quadruple bond. With all the ligand
               ands, on the other hand, have the opposite effect, they tend  environment of the metal being identical in these two com-
               to shorten the metal–metal bonds they bridge. When com-  pounds the difference in the metal–metal bond length may
               paring bond distances we must be careful to consider what  be wholly attributed to the inherent differences of each
               type of ligands are present in the molecules. So that ligand  metal.
               consideration might be diminished it would be advanta-  Another type of quadruply bound metal dimer is found
               geous to have a complete series of metal–metal bonded  in compounds with the general formula M 2 (L 2 CR) 4  where
               dimers with the same ligands all of which are coordinated  M = Cr,  Mo,  W  and  L = O,  S,  N.  One  example  is
                                                                                                           ˚
               in the same fashion. This, however, is not available so bond  Mo 2 (O 2 CH) 4 , with a Mo—Mo distance of 2.091(2) A. In
               distances alone do not provide sufficient information for a  these compounds the metal–metal bond is bridged by four
               goodcorrelationtobemadebetweenbondlengthandbond   uninegative, bidentate ligands giving a paddlewheel ge-
               order.                                            ometry to the compounds (Fig. 15). In such compounds
                 Another  structural  feature  of  a  metal  dimer  which  the configurational requirements of the ligands as well as
               may imply the presence of multiple metal–metal bond-  the presence of a δ bond confine these molecules to an
               ing is the stereochemical configuration of the molecule.  eclipsed configuration. As well as restricting the rotation
                        2−
               In [Re 2 Cl 8 ] , the compound for which the first quadruple  about the metal–metal bond these bidentate ligands can
               bond was proposed, the effects of the multiple bond on the  influence the metal–metal bond distance. Variations in the
               stereochemical configuration are clearly seen; [Re 2 Cl 8 ] 2−
               has no bridging chloride ligands. As such, we might ex-
               pect this compound to adopt a staggered configuration;
               however, this is not the case. An eclipsed configuration
               is maintained despite the fact that the short Re Re bond
                      ˚
               of 2.24 A brings the chloride ligands closer together than
               the sum of their van der Waals radii. This seemingly high
               energy configuration is necessitated by the presence of a
               δ bond as it is only in this configuration that a full δ bond
                                  ◦
               will remain intact. A 45 rotation about the Re Re bond
               giving the staggered conformation, would result in zero
               overlap between the two d xy -orbitals and total destruction
               of the δ bond. The δ bond, however, is quite tolerant to ro-
                                                     ◦
               tation about the metal–metal bond. Even at a 30 rotation,
               50% of the δ bond overlap remains. Therefore, quadruply  FIGURE 15 Structure of Mo 2 (O 2 CH) 4 . Note the paddle-wheel
               bonded metal dimers may alleviate some steric congestion  geometry typical of carboxylate-bridged metal dimers.
   270   271   272   273   274   275   276   277   278   279   280