Page 121 - Engineered Interfaces in Fiber Reinforced Composites
P. 121

104               Engineered interfaces in fiber reinforced composites

                       ri(a,z)   -dqo  + q~(a,z)l                                     (4.29)
                    The radial (compressive) stress, 90, is caused by the matrix shrinkage and differential
                    thermal contraction of the constituents upon cooling from the processing temper-
                    ature. It should be noted that q1 (a, z) is compressive (i.e. negative) when the fiber has
                    a lower Poisson ratio than the matrix (vf < v,)  as is the normal case for most fiber
                    composites. It follows that ql (a,z) acts in synergy with the compressive radial stress,
                    40, as opposed to the case of  the fiber pull-out test where the two radial stresses
                    counterbalance, to be demonstrated in Section 4.3. Combining Eqs. (4.1 l), (4.12),
                    (4,18) and (4.29), and for the boundary conditions at the debonded region

                        $(L)  = O,O',(L)  = 0- .                                      (4.30)

                    Solutions for the stress components are obtained as:
                          .;.(z)  = ol(a + o){ 1 - exp[-I(L  - 41)  ,                 (4.31)
                         drn(z) = 0 - yol (a + a){ 1 - exp[-I(L  - 41)  ,             (4.32)

                                                                                      (4.33)
                                la
                        ri(a,z) =-i~l(~+c~a)exp[-i(L-z)] .                            (4.34)
                                 2
                    Fig. 4.7 shows the approximate stress distributions in the constituents along the axial
                    direction of the left half of  the fiber for the carbon fiber-epoxy matrix composite
                    with the relevant interface properties for the XAlOO  fibers given in Table 4.2. The
                    FAS increases from the end towards the center while the MAS decreases in the same
                    direction, both of which are opposite to the axial stress distributions in fiber pull-out
                    and fiber push-out, to be shown in Sections 4.3 and 4.4. The IFSS increases from the
                    debond crack tip towards the fiber ends in the debonded region. This response makes
                    the debond propagation  very difficult and is attributed to the radial compressive
                    stress, 91,  arising from the differential Poisson contraction between the fiber and
                    matrix, which should be added to the residual compressive stress, qo. If the Poisson
                    effects are completely neglected in the fiber fragmentation analysis, the frictional
                    shear stress would become constant over the whole debonded region.

                    4.2.3.2. Interface  debond criterion
                      The interface debond criterion used  in  this analysis is based on the concept of
                    fracture  mechanics where  the  strain  energy  release  rate  against  the  incremental
                    debond length is equated to the interface fracture toughness, Gi,,  which is considered
                    to be a material constant

                                                                                      (4.35)


                    where  Ut is the  sum  of  the  strain energy stored  in  the  bonded  region  (ub,  for
                    t<z<L)  and  debonded  region  (ud, for  O<z<e),  which  can  be  obtained  by
   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126