Page 145 - Engineered Interfaces in Fiber Reinforced Composites
P. 145

128                Engineered interfaces im fiber reimforred composites

                   (1991) analyzed  the effect of  asperity pressure  in the fiber pull-out  and push-out
                   tests.  The  asperity  interactions  have  also  been  modeled  based  on  the  classical
                   Hertzian contact law, leading to a sinusoidal modulation of the sliding stress (Carter
                   et al.,  1991). Mackin et al. (1992a) also proposed a fractal model to incorporate the
                   asperity  effects in  the  push-out  loading  geometry.  In  addition, rigorous  fracture
                   mechanics analyses are presented by Liu et al. (1994a, b, 1995) for fiber pull-out and
                   push-out  using a Fourier series representation of the fiber roughness effect. It has
                   been  emphasized  (Keran  and  Parthasarathy,  1991; Mackin  et  al.,  1992a) that  a
                   proper asperity wear mechanism must be introduced to explain the variation of the
                   fiber reseating behavior with sliding distance. This is viewed as gradual degradation
                   of the interface (frictional) properties due to the cyclic sliding in fatigue.
                   4.3.2. Solutions .for stress distributions

                     Much  of  the analysis  to be presented  in  the following sections will encompass
                   what has  been reported  in  recent publications  (Kim  et al.,  1991,  1992,  1993a, b,
                    1994b; Zhou et al.,  1992a, b, c, 1993, 1994). A shear-lag model of the fiber pull-out
                   test shown in Fig. 4.21 is essentially similar to the composite model employed in the
                   fiber fragmentation test, except for the fiber end, which is exposed and is subjected
                   to external tensile stress in the fiber pull-out test. L is the total embedded fiber length
                   with  a  partial  debond  region  of  length e  from  the  free fiber end.  In  the  present
                   analysis, the matrix is fixed at the embedded (bottom) end (z = L) and a tensile stress
                   cr  is applied  to the free fiber end  (at z = 0). Other models with identical specimen
                   geometry but different loading condition in the fiber pull-out test, e.g. restrained top
                   and fixed  fiber/matrix bottom  ends,  have  been  presented  elsewhere (Zhou  et  al.,
























                                                         Y
                                                  2b

                           Fig. 4.21. Schematic drawing of the partially debonded fiber in fiber pull-out test.
   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150