Page 238 - Engineered Interfaces in Fiber Reinforced Composites
P. 238

220                Engineered  interfaces in $her  reinforced  composites


                                                                 ~
                                   ""V
                                   700 -        -.-.-  Monolithic mullite
                                                -
                                                     Uncoated SIC fibers
                                   600  -       .-............ BN-coated  SIC fibers
                                   500  -








                                                                              6
                                                   Displacement (mm)
                     Fig. 5.33. Load-displacement records of monolithic mullite, and Sic fiber reinforccd mullitc composites
                                       with  and without  BN coating. After Singh (1988).

                    composites. The coatings are deposited isothermally onto the fiber preform of plain
                    weave  fabric  from  an  argon/polypropylene  mixture  at  1100°C. By  varying  the
                     deposition time, coating thickness in the range 0.1-1.0  pm  are obtained.  Fig. 5.35
                     shows the load-displacement  curves obtained in flexure tests of the composites with
                    and  without  coating  layers  of  varying  thickness.  The  uncoated  fiber  composite
                    exhibits poor strength response and brittle fracture without any fiber pull-out, as do
                     the specimens with prior oxidation treatments. Incorporation of a graphite coating
                     promotes fiber pull-out, whose length increases with coating thickness. The linear
                     inverse relationship between interfacial shear strength and coating thickness has also
                     been  identified,  Fig. 5.36.  The  uncoated  fiber  composite with  a  strong chemical
                     bonding possesses the highest interfacial shear stress, while the specimen with  an
                     oxidized interlayer  shows no interfacial  bonding  because the oxidation  of carbon
                     produces a gap between the fiber and matrix.
                       Apart from functioning as a reaction  barrier, another important role of the low
                     modulus  interlayer  by  the  pyrolytic  graphite,  is  the  reduction  of  the  radial
                     compressive stress arising from differential thermal contraction between fiber and
                     matrix. Thicker carbon coatings give more reduction in thermal stresses than thinner
                     coatings, which is partly responsible for the inverse relationship between interfacial
                     shear strength and coating thickness (Fig. 5.36). A compliant coating is most useful
                     when the CTE for the fiber is smaller than the matrix material (Arnold et al., 1990),
                     as in most practical CMCs.
                       BN is also proven to be an efficient reaction barrier coating for Nicalon fiber-Sic
                     matrix systems (Naslain et  al.,  1991a, b). The coating promotes  a  non-linear and
                     non-catastrophic  fracture behavior  under tensile and impact loading. A coating of
                     0.5 pm in thickness exhibits the best mechanical properties (Prouhet et al.,  1994).
                     The use of C, BN, BN/SiC coatings on Nicalon Sic fibers is also suggested for Zr-
                     based matrix materials. Bender et al. (1986) have shown that the BN-coated Nicalon
                     fibers in  a  zirconia-based  matrix  (Zr02 + 50 mol%  SO2 and  ZrOz  +  50 mol%
   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243