Page 304 - Engineered Interfaces in Fiber Reinforced Composites
P. 304

Chapter 7. Improvement of transverse fracture  toughness with interface control   285

                  The tensile debonding model associated with the intermittently bonded interface,
                schematically shown Fig. 7.1, appears to be rather unrealistic in unidirectional fiber
                composites as the  stress  state near  the  crack  tip  should  be  three-dimensional  in
                nature (Kim and Mai,  1991a). The model certainly needs further verification as it
                requires complicated stress conditions to be satisfied. Nevertheless, there is no doubt
                that  the  longitudinal  splitting  promoted  by  the  weakened  interface  increases the
                interfaced debonding and subsequent fiber pull-out with large contributions  to the
                composite  fracture  toughness.  The  beneficial  effect  of  the  tensile  debonding
                mechanisms with crack bifurcation may be more clearly realized in the delamination
                promoter concept which is discussed in Section 7.4.


                7.2.2.  Fiber coating for improved energy absorption capability

                  It has been confirmed in Chapter 6 that for brittle polymer matrix composites,
                typically CFWs, a strong interface favors a brittle fracture mode with relatively low
                energy  absorption,  but  a  weak  interface  allows high  energy  absorption  through
                multiple shear failure (Novak,  1969; Bader et al., 1973). Carbon fibers coated with a
                silicone fluid resulted in the fibers being surrounded by an inert film which reduced
                the  interfacial  bond  strength  with  increased  toughness  (Harris  et  al.,  1971;
                Beaumont and Phillips,  1972). The major source of fracture toughness  for CFRP
                was  found  to  be  fiber  pull-out  following interface  debonding  (Harris,  1980). It
                follows  then  that  a  sufficiently  high  frictional  shear  stress,  zf, is  needed  while
                maintaining the lowest possible shear bond strength, Zb,  so that the work required to
                pull-out  the fibers against friction can be enhanced.
                  Several different viscous fluids have  been  investigated  as  interlayer  for  several
                different combinations of composite constituents. Sung et al. (1977) were the first to
                use  the concept of  strain  rate  sensitive coatings,  e.g.  SVF and silicone grease, to
                improve the impact toughness of glass fiber polyester matrix composites (GFRPs).
                Provided the silicone fluid is Newtonian and the shear stress is uniform, the pull-out
                toughness  of  a  composite with  short  fibers of  embedded  length,  le and pull-out
                distance, Epo  is given by






                where  q and  t  are  the  viscosity  and thickness  of  the  viscous fluid, and  vo is  the
                velocity of fiber pull-out. The fiber pull-out toughness is proportional  to the viscous
                shear stress acting on the fibers during pull-out at a given strain rate, which could be
                maximized  by  selecting  appropriate  coatings  of  high  fluid  viscosity  and  small
                thickness.  Fig.  7.3 shows the inverse relationship between fracture toughness  and
                coating thickness, with a higher viscosity giving a higher fracture toughness for a
                given coating thickness.
                  Rubbers  of  various  kinds  have  been  among  the  major  coating  materials  that
                received significant interest. The toughness of carbon fiber composites was improved
   299   300   301   302   303   304   305   306   307   308   309