Page 338 - Engineered Interfaces in Fiber Reinforced Composites
P. 338

Chapter 7.  Improvement of' transverse ,fracture toughness with interjace control   319

                where A  and h are parameters determined in the relationship between fiber strength
                a; and fiber length e: or  = A&-h. In theory, the fracture toughness should be at its
                maximum when the shrinkage stress can just compensate the Poisson contraction
                stress, which in turn allows the denominator of Eq. (7.15) to become close to zero.
                The R,,  versus qo plots for a CFRP and a GFRP given in Fig. 7.24  suggest that the
                fracture  toughness  can  be  improved  by  reducing  qo  without  deteriorating  other
                mechanical properties. Bailey et al. (1977) have been successful in developing special
                expanding monomers for  such applications.  Epoxy  resins are copolymerized  with
                approximately  5-10%  dinorbornene  (or  tetramethyl)  spiro  ortho carbonates  that
                balance  the shrinkage of resin  by  expansion through  ring  opening reactions.  In a
                series of experimental studies (Lim et al.,  1984; Lam and Piggott,  1989a, b,  1990),
                the residual  thermal  stresses in a CFRP have been reduced  successfully with  such
                special expanding monomers. The composites made therefrom have one-third of the
                usual residual stress with some 50% improvement of  Izod impact toughness and a
                slight  reduction  in  ILSS, as shown  in  Fig.  7.25. The addition  of  the  expanding
                monomers  also  gives improved  fatigue  properties  and  better  resistance  to water
                absorption of  the CFRP.
                  Unlike  carbon  fiber  composites,  the  expanding  monomers  demonstrate  little
                beneficial effect on GFRPs and KFRPs: it actually decreases the toughness by about
                30% for GFRP (Lim et al., 1984). It appears that there are many unresolved issues
                regarding the effects of important parameters, and there must be an optimum value
                for the fiber clamping stress, 40, which would maximize the fiber pull-out toughness.
                If  qo is  too  high,  interfacial  debonding  and  subsequent  fiber  pull-out  would  be
                inhibited;  whereas  if  qo  is  too  low,  only  a  small  frictional  energy  is  dissipated,
                because qo  controls directly these failure mechanisms  through  its influence on the


                              "E \ '0° E
                               2 60  +/'-I                        -80  0
                                                                   loo
                               i
                               Y
                                                  +-+,
                                                                      n
                               C

                                                                      ln
                               al                                 -6O.c I
                                                                      Y
                                                                      U
                                                                  -  40
                               c.
                               u
                               0
                               E
                               - 20           I         I          20
   333   334   335   336   337   338   339   340   341   342   343