Page 172 - Enhanced Oil Recovery in Shale and Tight Reservoirs
P. 172

156                            Enhanced Oil Recovery in Shale and Tight Reservoirs


          injectors were found more economical than vertical injectors (Karpov et al.,
          2016).

          7.2.5 Waterflooding in Pembina Cardium in Alberta
          By July 2014, only 15 out of 1500 horizontal wells with multistage
          fracturing were switched to water injectors. The distances from injectors
          to producers were 200e450 m. An obvious increase in oil rate was not
          observed from waterflooding (Karpov et al., 2016).

          7.2.6 Waterflooding in Vinogradova field in Russia
          The field was produced by horizontal wells of 1000 m with multistage frac-
          turing, and water was injected through vertical deviated wells. The well
          spacing from an injector to a producer was about 800 m. Low waterflood
          efficiency from vertical wells was observed (no significant oil rate increase
          but decreased decline rate). Horizontal injectors were better and planned
          for future development (Karpov et al., 2016).

          7.2.7 Summary of waterflooding performance
          The above three waterflooding projects were all conducted in Bakken for-
          mation. Their performance is summarized in Table 7.1. It can be seen that
          low sweep efficiency was a problem. However, there are a number of other
          fields where direct water breakthrough channels occurred, but higher oil
          recovery factors were still able to be reached (Baker et al., 2016).


               7.3 Water huff-n-puff injection
               Li (2015) summarized several favorable conditions for water huff-n-
          puff injection: (1) water-wet reservoirs, (2) well controlled volume (contain-
          ment, low permeability reservoirs), (3) high natural fracture density, (4) lack
          of reservoir energy (low pressure). Yu and Sheng (2017) conducted water
          huff-n-puff experiments. The experimental setup is shown in Fig. 7.3.
          The Quizix pump (QX-6000) was used for water injection to provide
          huff pressure in the vessel through the accumulator. An oil-saturated core
          was put in the vessel. There was 1.0 cm space between the inside wall of
          the vessel and the core outer boundary; such an annular space represented
          fractures surrounding the matrix in a reservoir. The huff and puff pressures
          were achieved through the three-way valve. The pump was operated in the
          mode of constant pressure delivery. With the solution injected into the
   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177