Page 200 - Enhanced Oil Recovery in Shale and Tight Reservoirs
P. 200

Fluid-rock interactions                                      183


















              Figure 8.9 Swelling strain of Mancos shale cores during water imbibition under
              different isotropic confining pressures.
              strain that was considered the total core swelling increased significantly first
              and then gradually stabilized. Swelling strain reduced due to compressive
              stress as the confining pressure was increased. It can be understood that a shale
              core can expand with water imbibition without confining pressure, probably
              resulting in larger pores or higher permeability. However, with a high
              confining pressure but the rock expanding, pores must shrink. The confining
              pressure has a significant effect on the water-rock interaction. These results are
              consistent with the observation from Ewy and Stankovic (2010) that
              confining pressure can significantly prevent induced swelling from occurring;
              there exists a threshold confining pressure below which swelling decreases
              with confining pressure.
                 Roshan et al. (2015) studied fracturing under isotropically confined condi-
              tions (by hydraulic pressure). A fracture was observed on a bedding plane when
              a shale core was immersed in deionized water for 40 h under 1000 psi, but the
              fracture formation took a longer time than the case without confinement.
              Note that the core could still expand under such hydraulic confinement.
                 To study the effect of anisotropic stresses, an anisotropic core holder was
              needed by Liu and Sheng (2019). Fig. 8.10 is the schematic of an anisotropic
              core holder which can be used under CT scan. The part 7 controls the
              confining pressure in the radial direction of the core, while the part 9 con-
              trols the axial pressure.
                 For water to be able to contact a core quickly, a hole of 13 mm diameter
              and 15 mm in length was drilled in a core of w38 mm in diameter and
              w51 mm in length, as shown in Fig. 8.11 (Liu and Sheng, 2019). The sam-
              ple was put in an FCH aluminum wrapped triaxial core holder. A fluid could
              flow into the core sample through the hole and the core end face. An axial
   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205