Page 195 - Enhanced Oil Recovery in Shale and Tight Reservoirs
P. 195

178                            Enhanced Oil Recovery in Shale and Tight Reservoirs


































          Figure 8.6 Effective gas permeability at different water imbibition times (Shen et al.,
          2017).
          cells and the gas permeability was quickly measured; after that the shale
          samples were put back to the imbibition cells for continued imbibition.
          And the shale samples were not confined during imbibition. They also
          used sandstone samples and volcanic samples to do the same type of experi-
          ments for comparison. The permeabilities from sandstone and volcanic sam-
          ples were continuously decreased as more water was imbibed.
             Santos et al. (1997a) studied the water-shale interactions and found that
          the reaction depended on the moisture of rock samples. The evidence of
          reactions (core disintegration or created microfractures) was not noticeable
          for preserved shale samples even at atmospheric conditions without confine-
          ment, but only noticeable for dry samples. Therefore, they concluded that the
          shale instability problem was mainly caused by mechanical failure (mud
          weight), rather than by chemical interaction between the rock and drilling
          fluid, as opposed to their initial hypothesis. Makhanov et al. (2014) observed
          that swelling of clay was not the only mechanism that creates microfractures,
          because some microfractures are also created with the imbibition of oil despite
          having no affinity for absorption in clays. This suggests that some pore pres-
          sure is developed due to imbibition of fluid (water or oil) or called mechanical
   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200