Page 227 - Enhanced Oil Recovery in Shale and Tight Reservoirs
P. 227

210                            Enhanced Oil Recovery in Shale and Tight Reservoirs


          dolomite (CaMg(CO 3 ) 2 ) and pyrite (FeS 2 ). Pyrite in shale reacts with per-
          sulfate to generate sulfuric acid by the following oxidation reaction:
              2FeS 2 þ 15S 2 O 2   þ 16H 2 O ¼ 2Fe 3þ  þ 34SO  2   þ 32H þ  (8.5)
                            8                          4
             Ammonium persulfate is a very strong oxidizer that is commonly used to
          decompose the gelling agent in hydraulic fracturing. The resultant sulfuric
          acid is a strong acid whose solution pH can be less than 2. Then this acid
          reacts with calcite and dolomite to precipitate gypsum crystal:
                         þ
             CaCO 3 þ 2H þ SO   2   þ H 2 O ¼ CaSO 4 $2H 2 O þ CO 2 [  (8.6)
                                4
                                          þ
                        CaMgðCO 3 Þ þ 2H þ SO    2   þ H 2 O
                                                 4
                                    2
                          ¼ CaSO 4 $2H 2 O þ MgSO þ 2CO 2 [            (8.7)
                                                  4
             The above reactions (processes) are called replacement reactions (pro-
          cesses), as the calcite and dolomite are dissolved by the acid and a new
          replacing mineral, gypsum, is precipitated in the immediate vicinity of the
          dissolved carbonate mineral surfaces. As gypsum has a higher molar volume
          (74.4 mL/mol) than calcite (36.9 mL/mol) and dolomite (64.3 mL/mol),
          the local replacement reactions can generate internal swelling stress that
          may fracture the surrounding shale matrix. The reaction-induced stress
          from crystallization pressure is on the grain scale. The crystallization pressure
          can easily exceed 30 MPa, which sufficiently causes intensive shale
          microfracturing.
             Fig. 8.32 shows the induced fractures when unconfined cylindrical shale
          samples were exposed to deionized water (a), H 2 SO 4 solution (b), and
          (NH 4 ) 2 S 2 O 8 solution (c). Few fractures were seen on shale samples exposed
          to deionized water. In contrast, many fractures could be seen when the
          samples were exposed to the chemical solutions. These induced fractures
          propagated parallel to the lamination. It took 3 and 5 days for those fractures
          to form for H 2 SO 4 solution (b) and (NH 4 ) 2 S 2 O 8 solution (c), respectively,
          indicating the H 2 SO 4 solution reaction was faster than the (NH 4 ) 2 S 2 O 8 solu-
          tion. Interestingly, the gypsum deposited in the induced fractures, and not on
          sample surfaces, indicating that those fractures were caused by the increased
          gypsum volume.
             (NH 4 ) 2 S 2 O 8 is a very strong oxidizer, whereas the dilute sulfuric acid
          solution is only a strong dibasic acid not an oxidizer. Oxidation reaction
          may significantly change the organic fraction and the color of black shale.
          Their experiments did not show obvious color change, and the
          fracture-generation behavior is similar in both the H 2 SO 4 solution and
   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232