Page 218 -
P. 218

194   Chapter 7 • Operations and Postimplementation

              readiness reviews the Go-live date should be assessed as to whether the date can be met. As with
              any project there should be a Go-live date with at least two other alternative dates. These Go-live
              dates, along with the readiness review status, will help the project management office decide on
              the actual Go-live date. The readiness review status and Go-live date must be communicated to
              all involved. This will be important to the credibility of the process.
                   A detailed report needs to be available, along with an executive summary for senior
              management. It is important to meet with senior management to review the readiness status
              for a couple of reasons: It will inform senior management on the status of the project and
              allow them to ask questions related to moving forward. It also gives the project management
              office another opportunity to discuss with senior management the successes and issues
              with the project. Even though senior management should generally be up to date on what is
              going on, the Go-live readiness meetings create a higher level of awareness of how this
              implementation will affect the company. Finally, there needs to be an abbreviated readiness
              review just before Go-live to assess any of the outstanding issues brought to light in the
              previous review.
                   The Go-Live Readiness Review and Status Report is often a table that shows the status of
              each area at a glance, with the key activities that need to be completed or a workaround agreed to
              before going live.





                              Sample Go-Live Readiness Review and Status Report







                                Category  Criterion  Criticality  Site 1  Site 2  Group 1  Group 2  Key Measures  Contingent  Workaround(s)  Decision Owner  Task Contact  Minimum “Pass   Status”  Current Actual Status  Assessment  Assessment Date




                               Category:        Technical infrastructure readiness
                                                Operational readiness
                                                Testing readiness
                                                Conversion readiness
                                                Training readiness
                                                Communications readiness
                                                Production support readiness
                                                Audit readiness
                                                Risk readiness
                                                Corporate management readiness
                               Criterion:       What activity or component needs
                                                to be ready?
                               Criticality:     High, medium, or low
                               Site or Group:   Area, location, or group that must
                                                be ready
                               Key              What activity or task needs to be
                               Measurement:     completed?
   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223