Page 195 - Failure Analysis Case Studies II
P. 195

180

            boxes. The ideal samples to examine would be those cut across suspected weld lines, since then the
            defects would be subjected to the highest stress when the samples were pulled in tension.
              Four samples were cut, two from the new tank in a region showing serious flow lines, and two
            from the failed tank showing similar flow lines, but well away from the failure crack. One of each
            pair was cut parallel to the flow lines, the other at right angles to the flow lines. The samples were
            about 7 cm long, and possessed a ca  1 cm narrow central region about 5 cm long, so giving a
            dumbell shape. The samples were cut very carefully using a small hacksaw along the pre-marked
            shape, and polished by hand with a series of finer emery papers to remove any edge imperfections
            which could cause premature fracture.
              All the specimens were tested at room temperature (ca 25°C) and ambient humidity (ca 50%),
            using a constant strain rate of 0.1 mm s-’.  Three of the four samples broke centrally, the fourth
            (No. 2) on the edge of the shoulder. All the samples broke in a brittle fashion, i.e. the two parts of
            the fracture surfaces could be fitted back together. The results were as follows:

                 Sample  No. 1 (new, lateral)   og = 84 MN m-’
                 Sample No. 2 (new, parallel)  oIj = 8 1 MN m-2

                 Sample No. 3 (old, parallel)  os = 80 MN m-2
                 Sample  No. 4 (old, lateral)   crI, = 55 MN m-2

              The elongation to break was very similar for the first three samples, at approximately 9%, and
            10% for the final sample.
              It may be noted that the best result of 84 MN m-* calculated for sample No.  1 fell somewhat
            below  the ideal value  given  in  the data  sheet for this polymer  (140 MN m-2). Sample No.  3
            appeared to have failed from a surface tool impression mark, present as a sharp corner across part
            of the  dumbell,  for  example. Inspection  of the  fracture  surfaces, however, showed them  to  be
            reasonably free of internal voids and cold slugs of the kind found in the fracture surface (Fig. 12).
            All the fracture surfaces showed a central ‘spine’ or cusp indicative of skin-core control of fracture,
            quite unlike that of the critical fracture. The calculated elongations to break are rather greater
            than the value of 6% quoted on the same sheet, both strength and elongation to break being given
            for samples conditioned to ambient temperature and humidity essentially identical to those used
            here. Comparison of the tensile strengths showed that the material from the new tank is superior
            to that from the failed tank. Although there were visible flow lines in all the samples, failure did
            not seem to be related  to them in any clear,  unambiguous way. In general, the tests reinforced
            earlier impressions when cutting the tanks for analysis of relatively stiff but brittle mechanical
            behaviour. The addition  of 30% chopped glass fibre improves the stiffness of nylon,  but at the
            expense of strength.



            5.  Discussion


              A reasonably clear picture  of  the failure emerged as a result  of detailed  examination  of  the
            critical fracture surface, and comparison of the properties of new and unused tanks. The critical
            crack probably  resulted  from the coalescence of several smaller cracks below  the fan  buttress.
   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200