Page 202 - Failure Analysis Case Studies II
P. 202

187





















                          Fig. 2.  Aerial view of Comet G-ALYU in testing tank. Crown Copyright. Reproduced with the permission of
                          the Controller of HMSO.

                      skin would have been equivalent to the explosion of a 5001b (220kg) bomb in the cabin [l]. To
                      remove the effects of the weight of the water inside the cabin, Yoke Uncle was placed inside a water
                      tank with the wings protruding through seals in the walls of the tank.
                        This arrangement enabled the loads associated with a flight to be applied in 5 min. This accelerated
                      testing showed a severe weakness to fatigue crack growth in the aircraft skin around cut-outs such
                      as windows and escape hatches. The skin of Yoke Uncle had undergone 3057 flight cycles [l] (1221
                      actual and 1836 simulated) before a fatigue crack grew to failure from a rivet hole near the forward
                      port escape hatch (Fig. 3). The crack length before final failure was less than 2 mm in this accelerated
                      test  [2]. This failure was then  repaired,  and the  simulated flight testing continued. Cracks were
                      observed around a number of other windows and in the wings, and their growth monitored. This
                      programme of tests was only stopped after 5546 pressurizations, when a fatigue crack grew to failure
                      from the port number 7 window, and removed a 4.5 m section of cabin wall. It was concluded [2]
                      that Comet Yoke Uncle, had it continued to fly, would have suffered cabin failure at around 9000 h.
                      In addition to the cabin pressurization  simulation, there were also proving tests conducted every
                      1000 flights to a pressure of 11 psi (76 kPa) to simulate those conducted by the operators or designers
                      from time to time [2] to test the structural integrity of the cabin.
                        The reconstruction of Yoke Peter at Farnborough continued until September 1954 as pieces were
                      recovered from the seabed by the Royal Navy. This process used underwater television cameras for
                      the first time, and was assisted by the break-up of scale models of the Comet at Farnborough to
                      ascertain the pattern of the falling pieces. Eventually, about 70% of the aircraft was recovered, and
                      this allowed a scenario for the last moments of the aircraft to be constructed.
                        Yoke Peter was the first jet aircraft to enter commercial service and, at the time of the accident,











                                                                   Port Number I Window




                                                        Forward Port escape Hatch
                                          W
                                       Fig. 3.  The main failure sites on Comets G-ALYP and G-ALYU.
   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207