Page 37 - Failure Analysis Case Studies II
P. 37

23
                                                   Table 1

                                    mode     sketch      m o\r>   note
                                              3                  frame bolts yield; rotation


                                      1                    829   about toes




                                      2    >r(             945   hinge in panel
                                             4                   frame bolts yield; rotation


                                      3                   1244   about heels




                                      4                   2571   hinge in angle leg


                                                         3344    frame and panel





                       too. Other modes only apply to large areas: for instance, failure by fracture of frame bolts obviously
                       does not apply to areas which do not include the connection between adjacent frames.
                         The table shows that the bolted connections between the frames are weak  by comparison with
                       the frames themselves, whereas the bending moment capacity of the composite panels is about the
                       same as the capacity of the bolted connections. This suggests that the capacity of the wall to resist
                       pressure is limited either by the frame bolts or by the strength of the composite panels between the
                       frames.


                                    6.  GLOBAL  STRENGTH  OF SEGMENTS OF FIREWALL

                         The wall can be thought of as a sequence of right-angled triangular segments, alternately base up
                       and base down, each segment corresponding to one of the triangles of the N-form truss. The base
                       of each triangle is bolted or welded to the ceiling or the floor, and the other two sides are clamped
                       to a vertical or a diagonal of the truss.
                         The triangles are almost identical, although not precisely so, because the relation between the
                       layout of the frames and the layout of the truss varies between segments. If we neglect that variation,
                       each triangular  segment can be treated  as part  of an infinite plate  between parallel abutments,
                       supported to form the infinite sequence of right-angled triangular segments sketched in Fig. 3. Under
                       a uniform pressure loading extended over the whole plate, each segment will deform identically, and
                       symmetry then imposes some conditions of the deformation. If w(x, y) is the deflection of triangular
                       segment 1 in Fig. 3, w(-x,b-y)  is the deflection of segment 0, w(a-x,  b-y)  is the deflection of
                       segment 2, and so on. Symmetry and continuity impose additional conditions on the derivatives on
                       the boundaries: for instance, on the vertical boundary between segment 2 and segment 3
                                                    WX(0, y) = - WAO, b - v)                    (1)

                       and therefore the rotation is zero at midheight, and the mean rotation  is zero on the boundary
                       between segments 2 and 3. The same condition applies on the inclined boundaries between  I  and 2,
                       between 3 and 4, and so on. Each triangular segment has no rotation on its horizontal side, and no
   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42