Page 399 - Failure Analysis Case Studies II
P. 399

Failure Analysis Case Studies I1
                   D.R.H. Jones (Editor)
                   0 2001 Elsevier Science Ltd.  All rights reserved                       383






                             HYDROGEN  CRACKING OF FERRITIC STAINLESS
                                     STEEL THERMAL  STORAGE TANKS

                                     SHINJI KONOSU* and TSWOSHI NAKANIWA
                         Department of Mechanical Engineering, Ibaraki University, 4-12-1  Nakanarusawa,  Hitachi 3 16, Japan
                                                (Receiced 28 January 1998)

                       Abstract-A   ferritic stainless steel (SUS436L), which was subjected to various kinds of reduction ratio was
                       precharged with hydrogen at 40°C in  15%  HCI solution by employing galvanic reaction with zinc. Tensile
                        tests were performed in air at room temperature  on both uncharged and charge specimens.  Finite element
                       method (FEM) analyses were carried out to obtain strain at panel comers under various different internal
                       radii in  a thermal storage tank when it was subjected to internal pressure. As a result, it was found that the
                       value of internal comer radius/thickness of the panel (R/t) should be more than about 2 in order to prevent
                       hydrogen embrittlement cracking. Q 1998 Published by Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
                       Keywords: Cleavage fracture, embrittlement, heat-exchanger failures, hydrogen-assisted cracking. tanks (fail-
                       ures).


                                                I.  INTRODUCTION

                   Ferritic stainless steel is frequently used in the manufacture of waterheating appliances due to its
                   excellent formability and its extremely high resistance to such shortcomings as pitting  and stress
                   corrosion cracking associated with austenitic stainless steel. However, because ferritic stainless steel
                   possesses high hydrogen embrittlement susceptibility, investigations are being conductcd [I] on the
                   effect of hydrogen on the mechanical properties of the material. Meanwhile, numerous accidents
                   thought  to be  due to hydrogen embrittlement  are occurring at the corner portions of cold-bent
                   ferritic stainless steel (SUS436L) panels used in thermal storage tanks.  It is believed  that fracture
                   elongation in hydrogen-charged ferritic stainless steel is largely due to the influence of cold working
                   and, further,  that the strain occurring on the inside of  bent  portions during water proof  tests is
                   attributable to the influence of the inner radius of the bent portion.
                     Hence, using ferritic stainless steel in the current series of investigations, the influence of cold
                   working on fracture elongation in hydrogen-charged specimens was determined experimentally and
                   the limits of hydrogen embrittlement cracking on the inside of cold-bent portions were studied and
                   clarified by analyses employing the finite element method.


                                    2.  FAILURE  OF THERMAL STORAGE TANK

                     Figure  1 shows a portion  of a thermal storage tank assembly measuring 4 m in height, 3 m in
                   width and 10 m in length. It consists of 4 banks of tanks stacked vertically, with three rows arranged
                   in the longitudinal direction. The tank panel is made from ferritic stainless steel (SUS436L), with
                   the corner portions being bent by cold forming, as shown in Fig. 2. Hot-dip zinc-coated steel tubes
                   are laid inside the tank. Coolant is passed through these tubes to freeze the water in the tank during
                   the night and the heat of melting is utilized during the day by means of air conditioners.
                     After water proof tests were conducted at the respective pressures concerned (Case 1: hydraulic
                   pressure 3.52 x IO-’ MPa, Case 2: 6.36 x IO-’ MPa), cracks were found in the corner portions (inner
                   radius R = I .62 mm). The appearance of the cracked portion in Case 2 is shown in Fig. 3. It can be
                   seen that the crack has propagated  from the inside of the panel toward the outside.

                    *Author to whom correspondence should bc addressed.
                   Reprinted from Engineering Failure Analysis 5 (4), 323-33 1 (1998)
   394   395   396   397   398   399   400   401   402   403   404